ENRICO USAI v EDWARD B. RUSSELL (Procurator Fiscal, Cupar)
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | 2000 SCCR 57 |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Unspecified Court (Scotland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Webster v Dominick
...Hume, i.310 Thomson or Walker, George 28 Feb 1831, Bell's Notes 86 Tudhope v Barlow 1981 SLT (Sh Ct) 94 Usai v RussellSCUNK 2000 JC 144; 2000 SCCR 57 Watt v AnnanSC 1978 JC 84; 1978 SLT 198 Textbooks etc. referred to: Alison, AJ, Principles and Practice of the Criminal Law of Scotland (1832......
-
George Clark+james Smith+liam Fagan V. Her Majesty's Advocate+procurator Fiscal, Airdrie
...(1995 Act, Sched. 5; Lord Advocate, Petr., [1998 JC 209; 1998 SCCR 401], Lord Justice General Rodger at p. 405A-C; Usai v Russell, 2000 SCCR 57, Lord McCluskey at p. 62B-C); but the crime may extend to any other form of indecency, for example sexual intercourse in public view (Paterson v Le......
-
Procurator Fiscal, Dunoon V. Allan Dominick
...is that of indecent exposure (1995 Act, Sched. 5; Lord Advocate, Petr., supra, Lord Justice General Rodger at p. 405A-C; Usai v Russell, 2000 SCCR 57, Lord McCluskey at p. 62B-C); but the crime may extend to any other form of indecency, for example sexual intercourse in public view (Paterso......
-
D.f. V. Procurator Fiscal, Dundee
...sexual activity in a children's play park. The source of that mens rea test for the offence was to be found in Usai v Russell 2000 JC 144, 2000 SCCR 57. [9] The Advocate depute in reply did not suggest that no question of mens rea arose beyond the deliberate nature of the appellant's conduc......