Enter Heading plaintiff, & Blake a auter defendants; Le case fuit que un D. Gives
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1665 |
| Date | 01 January 1665 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 523
DEL COMMON-BANK
XI. Enter Heading plaintiff, & Blake a auter defendants ; Le case fuit que un D. Gives per son voluut &c. devise mess, a Ea. Leche & John Leche, pur & durant le term de 21 ana a commens. imediatement a le jour de mort de un Joan Leche. [18] Et ai ill happ que le dit Ea. & John morer en le vie le dit Joan on apres son mort & devant que le dit term de 21. ana aprea le mort le dit Joati soit clerement determyn & expire, donques il devyse le residew de le dit terme dea ans temps & apace de le dit mes. totalment a Kateryn Leche a aver & tener tout le residew dell difc term temps & space de les dita 21. ana de le dit mess, a le dit Kateryn in semble manner & forme cycqme le dit terrae, temps & apace de 21. ans devaut est done a le dit Ea. & John, si eux ou un de eux avoint vive & injoy ceo in forme devant. Et immediatement aprea le mort le dit Joan & auxi aprea le dit determinacion et expiracion de le dit terme, temps & apace de les dita 21. ana de le dit Ea .& John, ou le dit Kateryne pluia ouster viver que le dit mess: remain a auter, &c. Eafe & Joan morust deins le terme de 21. ans, Kateryne viva & morust devant que tout le apace & terme de 21. ans fuit expire & intestate; la queation fuit, si le admitiistrat. Kateryne aver le mess, durant le residew dell terme de let dits 21. ans, ou que fuit determyn per son mort. Et fuit agre per le court que le terme Kateryne determyn per aon mort, et ceo appere d'estre le intent de le testator on auterment null intent poit estre collect aur les parols dell volunt: car Kateryne ne poit aver ceo durant lea viea Ea. & John, ceo eat impoaaible, &o. et pur 21 ana ell ne poit aver : le manner & forme intend fuit condicion si ils cy longement viver quel forme & condicion ne poit eatre join a le estate le dit Kateryne: car ceo fuit rayn, & son intent en ceux parola ne aerra prise vain si aacunment poit eatre iaaint prise come le ley allow. Et pur ceo doit estre prise que le dit Kateryne ceo aver ea aemble lorme come Ea. & J. avont, sc. si ell cy longement viver quel sens eat implia de ceux parols devant en le case : Fur intents de volunts sont devaut en cestui liver 15. cases queux Vide.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hsw Petitioner v Jjw Respondent
...that paragraph 17 was less definitive than paragraph 2, in imposing an obligation on HSW to account, he submitted that both paragraphs 2 and 17, considered in the context of commercial and accounting requirements, mandated that she alone should account for the benefit that she alone has rec......
-
Cayman Islands Tax Information Authority Appellants v M H Investments J A Investments Ltd Respondents
...the 2009 Revision, those sections were in these terms (so far as for material): ‘7(1) Upon receipt of a request, and subject to sections 6( 2) and 17(1), the Authority shall determine whether the request is in compliance with the relevant scheduled Agreement … and, if it is determined that ......
-
Cayman Islands Tax Information Authority Appellant v M H Investments J A Investments Ltd Respondents
...the 2009 Revision, those sections were in these terms (so far as for material): ‘7(1) Upon receipt of a request, and subject to sections 6( 2) and 17(1), the Authority shall determine whether the request is in compliance with the relevant scheduled Agreement … and, if it is determined that ......
-
Patricia Frances Grace v Minister for Land Information
...and gazetted, the Crown cannot acquire this land. [80] This interpretation accords with the purpose of TTWMA. The preamble and ss 2 and 17 set out the principal] purposes of the Act. These include the retention and utilisation of Māori land in the hands of its owners, whanau and hapu as the......