Erratum to ‘Human rights referendum: Dissonance between “the will of the people” and fundamental rights?’
| Published date | 01 September 2020 |
| Date | 01 September 2020 |
| DOI | 10.1177/0924051920946263 |
| Subject Matter | Erratum |
Erratum to ‘Human rights
referendum: Dissonance
between ‘‘the will of the people’’
and fundamental rights?’
Ignatius Yordan Nugraha, ‘Human rights referendum: Dissonance between ‘‘the will of the
people’’ and fundamental rights?’ (2020) 38 NQHR 115. DOI: 10.1177/0924051920923614
In the above referenced article, there was an error in the formatting of Table 1. The correct Table 1
is given below:
SAGE Publishing regrets that the formatting of Table 1 was set incorrectly during the production
process.
Table 1. Referendums under International Human Rights Law.
Type of
Referendum Incompatible with jus cogens Limiting Human Rights
Repealing Limitation/
Emancipating a Group
Compulsory
referendum
Obligation to prevent such a
referendum (including by
introducing an ex ante
peremptory norms
review)
Obligation to prevent such a
referendum, although it
could still be held if the
grounds of limitation are
fulfilled
Allowed as part of the State’s
constitutional processes,
but rejection by voters
cannot be invoked to justify
violation
Facultative
referendum
Not prohibited in principle,
other recourse preferred
and the result cannot be
invoked to justify violation
Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights
2020, Vol. 38(3) 235
ªThe Author(s) 2020
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0924051920946263
journals.sagepub.com/home/nqh
NQHR
NQHR
To continue reading
Request your trial