Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Esquimalt & Nanaimo R Company, Alpine Timber Company Ltd and Attorney-General of Canada v Attorney-General of British Columbia

The Law Reports Cited in 53 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1949
Date1949
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
49 cases
  • National Steel Car Ltd. v. Independent Electricity System Operator,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 27 April 2022
    ...24; Allard Contractors Ltd. v. Coquitlam (District) [1993] 4 S.C.R. 371 at p. 394; British Columbia v. Esquimalt and Nanaimo Railway Co., [1950] A.C. 87 (P.C.); Lower Mainland Dairy Products Sales Adjustment Committee v. Crystal Dairy, Ltd., [1933] A.C. 168 (P.C.); British Columbia v. Canad......
  • Genesis Land Development Corp. et al. v. Alberta et al., 2009 ABQB 221
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 9 April 2009
    ...[1970] S.C.R. 588, refd to. [para. 164]. Esquimalt and Nanaimo Railway v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1948] S.C.R. 403, varied [1950] A.C. 87 (P.C.), refd to. [para. Smoky River Coal Ltd. v. United Steelworkers of America, Local 7621 et al. (1985), 60 A.R. 36 (C.A.), refd to. [par......
  • Perry et al. v. Ontario, (1997) 100 O.A.C. 370 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 5 June 1997
    ...Stamp Vending Co., [1930] S.C.R. 500, refd to. [para. 67]. Esquimalt & Nanaimo Railway Co. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1950] A.C. 87 (P.C.), refd to. [para. R. v. Van der Peet (D.M.), [1996] 2 S.C.R. 507; 200 N.R. 1; 80 B.C.A.C. 81; 130 W.A.C. 81; 137 D.L.R.(4th) 289, refd ......
  • Ontario Home Builders' Association et al. v. Board of Education of York Region et al., (1996) 201 N.R. 81 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 22 August 1996
    ...(Attorney General), [1923] A.C. 136, refd to. [para. 46]. British Columbia (Attorney General) v. Esquimalt and Nanaimo Railway Co., [1950] A.C. 87 (P.C.), refd to. [para. Rattenbury v. Land Settlement Board, [1929] S.C.R. 52, refd to. [paras. 46, 130]. Reference Re Validity of Section 31 of......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Contract formation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...v A1 Quality Concrete Tanks Pty Ltd [2015] VSCa 75 at [55]. 248 See Attorney-General (British Columbia) v Equimalt & Nanaimo Railway Co [1950] 1 DLr 305 at 312–313, per Lord Greene (pC). 249 PRA Electrical Pty Ltd v Perseverance Exploration Pty Ltd [2007] VSCa 310. 250 Deeds need to be in w......
  • Draconian but not despotic: the 'unwritten' limits of parliamentary sovereignty in Canada.
    • Canada
    • Ottawa Law Review Vol. 41 No. 2, March 2010
    • 22 March 2010
    ...Assistance Plan (Canada), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 525 (S.C.C.), Esquimalt & Nanaimo Railway v. British Columbia (Attorney General) (1949), [1950] A.C. 87 (British Columbia EC.). Furthermore, I am unable to accept that when the justices were laying a foundation for their decisions in the Secessi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT