Euromarket Designs Inc. v Peters and Crate & Barrel Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2000 |
| Year | 2000 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
45 cases
-
Hotel Cipriani SRL and Others v Fred 250 Ltd (formerly known as Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd and Others
...it was and is targeted at UK consumers. There is no dispute that the correct approach to this question is that laid down in Euromarket Designs Inc v Peters [2001] FSR 20 at [12]-[20], 1–800 Flowers v Phonenames [2001] EWCA Civ 721, [2002] FSR 12 at [136]-[139] and Case C-324/09 L'Oréal S......
-
Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd v FE Global Electronics Pte Ltd and Others and Other Suits (No 2)
...patent [1997] RPC 179 (folld) Electro Cad Australia Pty Ltd v Mejati RCS Sdn Bhd [1998] 3 MLJ 422 (folld) Euromarket Designs Inc v Peters [2001] FSR 20 (folld) Flexible Directional Indicators Ltd's Application [1994] RPC 207 (distd) General Tire & Rubber Company v The Firestone Tyre and Rub......
-
Dearlove (Richard) v Combs (Sean)
...within the jurisdiction if he confines himself to the Internet.” 24 The same issue arose again before Jacob J in Euromarket Designs Inc v Peters and Crate & Barrel Ltd [2001] FSR 20. In that case the claimant brought proceedings for infringement of its UK and Community trade mark registrati......
-
Merck KGaA (Respondent/Appellant/Claimant) v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation and Others (Appellants/Respondents/Defendants)
...approach: see 800 FLOWERS Trade Mark (also known as 1–800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd) [2000] ETMR 369; Euromarket Designs Inc v Peters [2000] ETMR 1025, [2001] FSR 20; [2000] FSR. 697; Dearlove (t/a Diddy) v Combs (t/a Sean Puffy Combs, Puffy and P Diddy) [2007] EWHC 375 (Ch); [2008] EML......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Intellectual Property Law
...patented invention was being made in Singapore. In adopting this approach, Lai J referred with approval to Euromarket Designs Inc v Peters[2001] FSR 20, an English trade mark case where Jacob J (as he then was) held that the appearance of a trade mark on a website that could be accessed in ......
-
Intellectual Property Law
...of the website owner and what the reader will understand if he accesses the site. 16.148 In a later case, Euromarket Designs Inc v Peters[2001] FSR 20 (‘Euromarket’), Jacob J also said (at [16]) that ‘there must be an inquiry as to what the purpose and effect of the advertisement in questio......
-
RESOLVING DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES — A SINGAPORE PERSPECTIVE
...users within that jurisdiction. 63 This appears to be the position in England after Euromarket Designs Incorporated v Peters and Another[2000] ETMR 1025, [2001] FSR 288. In that case, the defendants, who owned a shop in Dublin, Ireland that sold furnishings and accessories under the name “C......