Everett v Ribbands

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1952
Year1952
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
58 cases
  • Kesarmal and Another v Valliappa Chettiar and Another
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1954
  • Gibbs, Commissioner of Police v Attorney-General et Al
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 29 January 1998
    ...seldom successfully prosecuted: Elsee v Smith ((1822) 2 Chit 304), Hope v EveredELR ((1886)) 17 QBD 338, 340), Everett v RibbandsELR ([1952] 2 QB 198, 205),Reynolds v Commissioner of Police of the MetropolisELR ([1985] QB 881, 886). It was akin to malicious prosecution and to the less commo......
  • Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Herbert Smith & Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 May 1968
    ...1961 1 W.L.R. 828), at page 835. I do not think that is correct. The true rule was stated by Lord Justice Homer in ( Everett v. Ribbands 1952 2 Q.B. 206): "When you have a point of law which, if decided in one way, is going to be decisive of the litigation, the advantage ought to be taken o......
  • Ayer Itam Height Sdn Bhd v Chung Nyuk Sell @ Henry Chung
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Action
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Laws of Nigeria. Volume 1 Action
    • 8 September 2016
    ...partly of law and partly of fact, which the trial Judge may generally dispose of before, at or after the trial. See Everett v. Ribbands (1952) 2 Q.B. 198 p. 206. See also Vol. 30 Halsbury Laws of England (3rd Edn) p.17n. However, under Order 29 rule 3 of our local rule, it is disposed of be......
  • Courts 2
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 6: Part II Courts 2
    • 27 June 2016
    ...quite explicitly followed, in my view, the practice of the Courts over the years as expressed by Romer L.J. in Everett v. Ribbands (1952) 2 Q.B. 198, 206 that: - “Where you have a point of law which, if decided in one way is going to be decisive of litigation, advantage ought to be taken of......
  • Jurisdiction
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 13 Jurisdiction
    • 10 July 2016
    ...Eleko v. Baddeley & Oth. (1925) 6 N.L.R. 65; Afbizounon v. The Northern Assurance Co. Ltd. (1934) 11 N.L.R. 177; Everett v. Ribbands (1952) 2 Q.B.198; Adis v. Crocker (1961) 1 Q.B. 11.” - Per Obadina, J.C.A. in Makeri Co. Ltd. v. Access Bank (Nig.) Plc . Suit No. CA/J/ 31/2000; (2002) 7 N.W......
  • Cases referred to in 1989 Part II
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1989. Part II Preliminary Sections
    • 29 January 1920
    ...v. Faro 12 W.A.C.A. 135. ................................................................................... 446 Everett v. Ribbends (1952) 2 Q.B. 198, 202. ............................................................. 198 Ex parte Olakunrin (1985) 1 N.W.L.R. (pt. 4) 652. .....103 Ex-Parte ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT