Evesq de Excester lesse terre en le County de Devon per fait indent rendant Rent
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
Date | 01 January 1664 |
Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 335
DEL COMMON-BANK
LXIII. Eveaq^ da Exoester lease terre en le County de Devon per fait indent rendant Rent annuelment al dit Evesc^ & sea successors al Excester, &c. Et aur condition de re-entry pur default de payment, Ou en fait I'Evea^ ad un Palace en Exceater en droit de son Evesquery, Et lea Juaticea del banke diae que le rent doit estre demand al Palace & a nul auter lieu, & q^ si le lessee vient a mesme le jour a le grand & commen port de mesme le Palace [28] & tende mesme le Rent la ai mesrae le port close soit ou appiert 336 1 ANDERSON, 29. son tender est bone nient obstant que 1'Evesque est deins le Palace adonquea ne il ou ascun de sea servants la a mesme le port; car le dit lessee...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Shadrock v R
...70 Citing Singh v R [2010] NZSC 161, [2011] 2 NZLR 322 at [21]–[39]. 71R v Fenton CA223/00, 14 September 2000. 72 Evidence Act, ss 12A and 27. 73R v Fenton at [25]; Rolston v R [2008] NZCA 431 at [60] and Smith v R [2008] NZCA 266 at 74 See Williams v R [2011] NZCA 245. 75 See Chahil v R [2......
-
Max John Beckham v R
...That explanation was also put forward at the trial. The olive oil reference was an exchange of a few seconds in a call lasting 15 minutes and 27 seconds. The wider discussion of glassware occupied about one and half minutes of the call. (iv) Money from legitimate sources 68 Part of the Crow......
-
Auckland Council v The Chief Executive of The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment Hc Ak
...action was attached.Subsequently, officials processed that application and the two claims were joined together through operation of ss 26(1 and 27(1) of the Analysis (a) The Council's judicial review application 27 Mr Rainey, for Ms Bamford, submitted that no decision of the Chief Executive......
-
Dushkar Kanchan Singh v R
...prejudice and needless prolongation of the hearing. Both are elements of the right to justice and to present a defence promised by ss 25(e) and 27 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, themselves reflecting the common law which continues to inform evidentiary decisions. 18 53 The appe......