Ex parte Mercer. Re Wise

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1886
Date1886
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
24 cases
  • Prentice v Cummins (No 5)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Marcolongo v Chen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 9 March 2011
    ...Clough [1904] 2 KB 769. 44Mackay v Douglas (1872) LR 14 Eq 106. 45Freeman v Pope (1870) LR 5 Ch App 538; Ex parte Mercer; In re Wise (1886) 17 QBD 290; Re Holland; Gregg v Holland [1902] 2 Ch 360; see Re Tetley; Ex parte Jeffrey (1896) 3 Mans 46 See Halsbury's Laws of England, 1st ed (1911)......
  • Williams v Lloyd; Re Williams
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Regal Castings Ltd v G M and G N Lightbody and
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 23 October 2008
    ...facing financial difficulty disposes of assets. 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 In most cases the circumstance that an At p 540. At p 541. (1886) 17 QBD 290 at p 298 [1992] 2 NZLR 144 at p 152 (CA). At p 147. At p 148. Williams v Lloyd (1934) 50 CLR 341 at p 361 per Starke J. Cannane at p 592 pe......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Enhancing the Bankrupt Estate
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law. Second Edition Part One
    • 19 June 2015
    ...of good faith does not add anything more in respect of the honesty or intent of the parties. Some 133 (1870), 5 Ch App 538. 134 (1886), 17 QBD 290. 135 (1900), 31 SCR 91. 136 Mandryk v Merko (1971), 15 CBR (NS) 246 (Man CA); Mutual Trust Co v Stornelli (1995), 43 CBR (3d) 221 (Ont Ct Gen Di......