Ex parte Norrish

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date12 July 1821
Date12 July 1821
CourtHigh Court of Chancery

English Reports Citation: 37 E.R. 811

HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY

Ex parte Norrish

Ex parte norrish. Rolls. July 12, 1821. The Court has no jurisdiction on petition in the case of a Friendly Society, where they have ceased to act on the rules allowed and filed pursuant to the statute. This was a petition under the statute 33 Geo. 3, c. 54, praying that J. Petrie, late one of the trustees of a friendly society, might be ordered to transfer and pay over some, funds in his hands, to a new trustee appointed in his stead. The society had been formed in the year 1795 ; the rules had afterwards been altered, and in the year 1813, they were allowed at the Quarter Sessions, and filed with the Clerk of the Peace, pursuant to the act. Soon after that time, some dissatisfaction with the conduct of the officers had arisen, and a committee was appointed for the regu- 812 HILL V. KTRWAN JACOB, 163. lation of the affairs of the society. It appeared that since that time the rules had not been attended to ; meetings had not been hold, or payments made, and officers had not been regularly appointed. Petrie stated that the new trustee had not been chosen according to the rules, and imputed to the other parties various acts of extravagant waste of the funds. Mr. Barber...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Sacheverell v Walker. in B. R
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
    ...S., although it is possible the beasts might not be sold (b), and cited Bro. Action sur le Case, 120. 9 H. 6, 60. An action against (2) Cro. Jac. 162. 1 Rol. Ab. 35. Post, c. 302. (3) 1 Rol. Ab. 62-3. Hmnber v. Ainge, Mann. Index, 195, 2d edit. (d) See cases of slander, post, p. 274-280. Of......
  • Turner v Sterling, Lord Mayor. in C. B
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1826
    ...S., although it is possible the beasts might not be sold (b), and cited Bro. Action sur le Case, 120. 9 H. 6, 60. An action against (2) Cro. Jac. 162. 1 Rol. Ab. 35. Post, c. 302. (3) 1 Rol. Ab. 62-3. Hmnber v. Ainge, Mann. Index, 195, 2d edit. (d) See cases of slander, post, p. 274-280. Of......
  • Clough v Ratcliffe
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 1 January 1847
    ...for purposes of a religious or charitable nature only. They also referred to Ewing v. Osbaldeston (2 Myl. & Cr. 53),. and JExparte Norris (Jac. 162); and said that, as Lord Eldon, in Pierce v. Piper (17" Ves. 1), altered the rules of a society, so in this case the Court would, if necessary,......
  • The Queen against Lord Godolphin and Another, Justices of Cambridgeshire
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the Queen's Bench
    • 1 January 1838
    ...understood themselves to stand when they joined the society. The only decided case exactly in point, which was cited, is Ex parte Norrish (Jac. 162). That was an application made in 1821 to the Master of the Rolls, by petition, in order to a summary proceeding against a late trustee of a fr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT