Ex parte Page and Others, Samuel Remnant, a Bankrupt
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1786 |
Date | 01 January 1786 |
Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 29 E.R. 69
LINCOLN'S INN HALL
2 BEO. e. C. 120. EX PARTE PAGE 69 Ex parte page and Others, in the Matter of samuel remnant, a Bankrupt. Lincoln's Inn Hall, 1 August [1786]. Joint creditors admitted to prove and take dividends under a separate commission against one partner. (Vide Ex parte Cobham, 1 Bro. C. G. 576, and the notes. Ex parte Hodgson, 2 Bro. 0. C. 5, and Ex parte Flintum, the next case.) William Page, 16th December, petitioned to be admitted, to prove under a separate commission taken out against Samuel Remnant. Before the date, and suing forth of the commission against Remnant, he, together with one James Hicks, being jointly concerned in an attempt to raise the Royal George, the petitioners, at the request and joint account of the bankrupt and the said James Hicks, severally furnished divers goods and materials, for and in the prosecution of such their design, whereby they became indebted to the petitioners as follows : To Page, £60, 4s. Id.; White, £90, 7s. lid.; Parmeter, £41, 3s.; Stephens, £45, 10s. 6d. The 14th August 1784, a separate commission was taken out against Remnant. [120] The commissioners...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Murphy v Taylor
...v. GriersonUNK 2 Ball & B. 274, 279. Williams v. OwenENR 5 My. & Cr. 305, 307. Irnham v. ChildENR 1 Bro. C. C. 92. Portmore v. MorrisENR 2 Bro. C. C. 119. Lawson v. LaudeENR 1 Dick. 346. Rich v. JacksonENR 4 Bro. C. C. 514. Clowes v. HigginsonENR 1 V. & B. 524. Higginson v. Clowes 15 Ves. 5......