Fairbairn v Scottish National Party

JurisdictionScotland
Judgment Date26 April 1979
Docket NumberNo. 31.
Date26 April 1979
CourtCourt of Session (Outer House)

OUTER HOUSE.

Lord Ross.

No. 31.
FAIRBAIRN
and
SCOTTISH NATIONAL PARTY

Defamation—Slander—Defamatory implication—Innuendo—Statements in pamphlet that the mail addressed to a Member of Parliament was uncollected—Whether capable of bearing defamatory innuendo—Whether interdict should be granted on balance of convenience.

Election law—Conduct of election—Illegal practices—Whether making of false statements in relation to public character of Member of Parliament an illegal practice—Representation of the People Act 1949 (cap. 68), sec. 91 (1)1.

A pamphlet distributed free to homes in a parliamentary constituency during a General Election contained the following extract about the former Member of Parliament who was a candidate in the election:

"Not everyone can aspire to the complete neutrality which Mailstrom maintains about the coming General Election. The staff of the House of Commons Post Office, for example, are believed to take a particular view about the result in West Perth and Kinross. This may have something to do with the fact that they have taken to complaining that the uncollected mail for the colourful Nicholas Fairbairn, M.P., is threatening to take over their entire space."

The candidate concerned alleged that the statement was defamatory as bearing the innuendo that he failed to deal with correspondence from his constituents; and that the making of the statement was an illegal practice under sec. 91 (1) of the Representation of the People Act 1949 because it was a false statement of fact in relation to his personal character or conduct.

Held (1) that a distinction fell to be drawn between a false statement in relation to the personal character or conduct of a candidate and a false statement in relation to the public or official character of a candidate. An illegal practice in terms of sec. 91 of the Representation of the People Act 1949 had to involve a false statement of fact directly relating to the personal character of the candidate.

Dicta of Darling J. in The Cockermouth Division Case (1901) 5 O'Malley & Hardcastle 155, 159; and Gibson J. in The North Louth CaseENR (1911) 6 O'Malley & Hardcastle 103, 157 and 163 applied.

(2) That the words complained of reflected on the public or political character of the candidate concerned but not upon his personal character; and accordingly there was no illegal practice under sec. 91 (1) of the 1949 Act.

(3) That the words complained of were reasonably capable of bearing

the innuendo...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • R (Woolas) v Parliamentary Election Court for Oldham East and Saddleworth
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 3 December 2010
    ...of a parliamentary election court sitting in Ireland before the grant of its independence) and Fairbairn v Scottish National Party [1979] SC 393 (a decision of Lord Ross sitting in the Outer House). The Election Court concluded at paragraphs 31–35 that a false statement of fact might relate......
  • Alan Massie V. Callum Mccaig And Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 1 March 2013
    ...v Associated Scottish Newspapers LtdENR 1929 SC 14; 1928 SLT 654 Elder v Gillespie 1923 SLT 32 Fairbairn v Scottish National PartySC 1979 SC 393; 1980 SLT 149 Gillick v British Broadcasting Corporation [1996] EMLR 267 Greene v Associated Newspapers LtdUNKELRWLRUNK [2004] EWCA Civ 1462; [200......
  • Petition Of Timothy Morrison And Others Against Alistair Carmichael Mp And Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 29 September 2015
    ...more than a loose or consequential connection (Martin v Most, 2010 SC (UKSC) 10, paragraph 49; Fairbairn v Scottish National Party, 1979 SC 393, pages 396-397; R (Woolas) v Parliamentary Election Court [2012] QB 1, paragraphs 70 et seq.) What Mr Carmichael said was clearly related to public......
  • Stuart Campbell Against Kezia Dugdale
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 27 May 2020
    ...the matter was one of public interest (which was not in issue); and the comment on the facts was fair (Fairbairn v Scottish National Party 1979 SC 393; Massie v McCaig (No. 1) (supra)). Whether the comment was a fair inference was a matter of common sense (Massie v McCaig (No. 1) (supra)). ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT