Fairfold Properties Ltd v Exmouth Docks Company Ltd (No 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 26 March 1992 |
| Date | 26 March 1992 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Mastercigars v Withers LLP
...Section 73 could be made when the costs had not been assessed. He directed himself, correctly, by reference to Fairfold Properties Limited v Exmouth Docks Co Limited (Number 2) [1993] Ch196 that an order for costs which remained to be assessed constituted “property” within Section 73. Alth......
-
Candey Ltd v Russell Crumpler and Christopher Farmer (as Joint Liquidators of Peak Hotels & Resorts Ltd ((in Liquidation)))
...exists, it should be enforced by the court unless there are good reasons why not: see for example Fairfold Ltd v Exmouth Docks Co Ltd [1993] Ch 196, per Ferris J at p. 204E and Solland (No 2) para. 22 and the cases cited there. (j) The Lien Issue: conclusion 96 I would dismiss the appeal o......
-
Maurice O. Gunton & Company v Robert K. Adams
...Estate of FOLD (No. 4) [1968] P. 797; Halvanon Insurance Co. Ltd v Central Reinsurance Corp [1988] 1 WLR 1122; and Fairfold Properties Ltd v Exmouth Docks Co. Ltd. No. 2) [1993] Ch. 196; Gavin Edmondson and Botts to support his submissions on the law relating to attorneys' 45 Mr. Glinton ......
-
Phillips Legal Professional Corporation v Schenher, 2020 SKCA 87
...takes priority over the other liens attaching to the property: see also Fairfold Properties Ltd. v. Exmouth Docks Co. (No. 2) [1992] 4 All E.R. 289 (Ch.) at 294; McReady Products Ltd. v. Sherwin-Williams Co. of Canada Ltd. (1986) 68 A.R. 342 Q.B. at 349-50; paras. 21-7 of Budinsky v. The Br......
Request a trial to view additional results