Fairline Shipping Corporation v Adamson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1974
Date1974
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
37 cases
  • Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corporation (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 July 2000
    ...carrying out his duties for the company, assume a personal liability. An example where personal liability was assumed was Fairline Shipping Corporation v Adamson [1975] QB 180. A different conclusion was reached in Trevor Ivory Ltd v Adamson [1997] 2 NZLR 517. What amounts to such an assum......
  • Bush v Summit Advances Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • BP Plc v Aon Ltd [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 13 March 2006
    ...responsibility towards the prospective franchisees. An example of such a case being established is Fairline Shipping Corp v AdamsonELR[1975] QB 180. The plaintiffs sued the defendant, a director of a warehousing company, for the negligent storage of perishable goods. The contract was betwee......
  • Merrett v Babb
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 February 2001
    ...assumed personal responsibility towards the prospective franchisees [page 835H]." 74 Lord Steyn at page 836 A referred to Fairline Shipping Corporation v Adamson [1975] QB 180; a case where the director was held liable. He wrote to the customer and created the clear impression that he was p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • TORTIOUS ACTS AND DIRECTORS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...5Yuille v B & B Fisheries (Leigh) LtdUNK[1958] 2 Lloyd's Rep 596 at 619. 6[1932] AC 562. 7 See also Fairline Shipping Corp v AdamsonELR[1975] 1 QB 180 where the plaintiffs had agreed with a company that the plaintiffs' perishable goods would be stored in a refrigerated store belonging to th......
  • Directors’‘Tortious’ Liability: Contract, Tort or Company Law?
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 62-1, January 1999
    • 1 January 1999
    ...in Williams adopted thisapproach, and it is arguable that this was the approach taken by Kerr J in Fairline ShippingCorporation vAdamson [1975] QB 180.43 [1992] 2 NZLR 517, 526–527.44 Although dealing with a quite different question, Hardie Boys J’s conception of the doctrinalrelationship b......
  • Case Comments: Directors' Co-liability for Delicts
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...liability, thereby creating a special relationship between the plaintiff and himself (see Fairline Shipping Corporation v Adamson [1975] QB 180 (ChD)); or if he procured or induced another, the company, to commit the tort (Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corporation & O......
  • Piercing the corporate veil – old metaphor, modern practice?
    • South Africa
    • Juta Journal of Corporate Commercial Law & Practice No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...obligation. So, for example, a person with a tort claim only, for example for personal injury or financial loss, might not be able 11 [1975] QB 180.12 Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd [1973] AC 360. A company is referred to as a quasi-partnership where, as held in this case, although mem......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT