Fear and Loathing in Legal Academia: Legal Academics' Perceptions of Their Field and Their Curious Imaginaries of How 'Outsiders' Perceive It
Author | Nicolette Priaulx, Martin Weinel, Willow Leonard-Clarke, Thomas Hayes |
Pages | 17-80 |
This article concerns the question of how legal academics imagine ‘outsiders’ perceive
legal academia. Centralising our empirical work undertaken at a UK research
intensive University which explored the attitudes, beliefs and knowledges of non-
from benchmarking surveys with legal academics which invited self-evaluations
note the presence of a curious divergence between self-perceptions of legal academia
a review of the legal scholarly literature, our study reveals a persistently bleak
‘folklore’ surrounding the question of how ‘outsiders’ will regard legal academia –
work of this nature for better understanding legal academia and its relationship with
opportunities for cross-disciplinary collaboration. As we argue by reference to our
Empirical study, Meta-disciplinary Analysis, Legal Academics, Cross-disciplinary
Attitudes, Insider Imaginaries
© 2020 Nicolette Priaulx et al., published by Sciendo.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
9 Br. J. Am. Leg. Studies (2020)
A. Perceptions of Legal Academia and the Importance of ‘Insider
Imaginaries’ .......................................................................................
B. Portrayals of Legal Academia: Characterising Approaches to Legal
Research ..............................................................................................
A. Methods and Research Approach ...................................................
Legal Academia and Insider Imaginaries: Points of Convergence and
Divergence .........................................................................................
C. Bleak Legal Imaginaries ................................................................
18
Fear and Loathing in Legal Academia: Legal Academics’ Perceptions of Their Field
and Their Curious Imaginaries of How ‘Outsiders’ Perceive It
Legal ...................................................................................................
F. Findings on Research Approaches ..................................................
19
To continue reading
Request your trial