Fenton v Thorley & Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Year | 1903 |
| Date | 1903 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
130 cases
- Golden Hope Rubber Estate Ltd v Muniammah and Others
- American Home Assurance Company v Nalin Industries Sdn Bhd
-
Mills v Smith (Sinclair Third Party)
... ... Fenton v. Thorley & Co. Ltd. [1903] A.C. 443; 19 T.L.R. 684, H.L. and Trim Joint District School Board of ... ...
-
Ismay, Imrie & Company v Williamson
... ... There was nothing abnormal — nothing, to use Lord Macnaghten's words in Fenton v. ThorleyF1, in the nature of “an unlooked-for mishap or an untoward event which is not expected or designed.” There was simply a natural effect ... ...
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Progressive Homes Ltd. v. Lombard General Insurance Co. Of Canada, 2010 SCC 33
...Life Co., 2003 SCC 16, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 158, at para.20; Canadian Indemnity, at pp.315-16; originating in Fenton v. Thorley & Co., [1903] A.C. 443, at p. 448). When an event is unlooked for, unexpected or not intended by the insured, it is fortuitous. This is a requirement of coverage; t......
-
What Is An 'Accident': The Story Of A Muddled Definition
...identify as an "accident". After all, don't we all know an accident when we see one? Footnotes 1 Fenton v. Thorley & Co., Ltd., [1903] A.C. 443. 2 Stats v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co., [1978] 2 S.C.R. 1153, 87 D.L.R. (3d) 3Voisin v. Royal Insurance Co. of Canada (1988), 66 O.R. (2d) 4......
5 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...[1990] BCJ No 720 (CA) ...................................................................... 503, 504 Fenton v J Thorley & Co Ltd, [1903] AC 443 (HL) ...................................300, 304 Ferguson v National Life Assurance Co of Canada (1996), 1 OTC 81, 36 CCLI (2d) 95, [1996] OJ No ......
-
Delict
...Paras 1–3.360 Para 12.361 Nicosia v Workmen’s Compensation Commission 1954 (3) SA 897 (T) 900D–902C; Fenton v J Thorley and Co Limited 1903 AC 443 at 448; MEC for the Department of Health, Free State Province v DN 2015 (1) SA 182 (SCA) para 33.362 Para 14 (emphasis added).363 1966 (1) SA 41......
-
Coverage
...in Walkem Machinery was predicated on the absurdity of excluding negligence from coverage in a liability policy: ibid at 1172–73. 77 [1903] AC 443 at 448 (HL) [ Fenton ]. 78 Stats , above note 19 at 1164. Coverage 301 also discussed Candler v London & Lancashire Guarantee & Accident Company......
-
Hit and Miss?: An Elementary Analysis of Domestic Criminal Statutes and Involuntary Manslaughter in Fatal Maritime Collisions and near Miss Incidents
...In many instances, 30 C. Hodgetts, ‘The Devil or the Deep Blue Sea’ (2012) 45 (4) Nautilus International Telegraph 22.31 Fenton v Thorley [1903] AC 443 at 453.32 Ibid. at The Journal of Criminal Law42collisions or near miss incidents occur as a result of risks which have not been foreseen, ......
Get Started for Free
