Field v Field
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2003 |
| Year | 2003 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
TMSF v Merrill Lynch
...1 W.L.R. 1139; [1990] 3 All E.R. 263, referred to. (11) Edwards & Co. v. Picard, [1909] 2 K.B. 903, not followed. (12) Field v. Field, [2003] 1 F.L.R. 376; [2003] Fam. Law 76, distinguished. (13) Gilchrist, Ex p., In re ArmstrongELR(1886), 17 Q.B.D. 521, dicta of Fry, L.J. considered. (14) ......
-
Blight and Others v Brewster
...clearly has the means of paying the 25% to the Claimants: all he has to do is to give notice to Canada Life. 61 The Defendant relies on Field v Field [2003] 1 FLR 376. This concerned an application to enforce an order that a husband pay a wife a lump sum payment by an injunction or through ......
-
Ankita Goyal v Amit Goyal
...to draw down the maximum lump sum available under his pension in order to satisfy a judgment obtained against him. The decision in Field v Field [2003] 1 FLR 376 to contrary effect was disapproved. 45 So here a bolstering injunction could be made, and Mr Turner QC accepted this. I might add......
-
Masri v Consolidated Contractors International UK Ltd and Others (No. 2)
...bars on assignment contained in the PSA and the JOA, which I have set out above. In support of this proposition, he relied upon Field v Field [2003] 1 FLR 376 and a statement at paragraph 6.46 of Commercial Enforcement by Sarah Payne, 2005, to the effect that, if there was a contractual ba......
Request a trial to view additional results