Field v Field
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1964 |
| Date | 1964 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Porter v Porter
...any facts in relation to the husband's conduct, and it is as well to say at the outset that the present case is very different to that of Field v. Field, 1964 p. 336, in which certain estoppels were created by the course taken in court. 10 On the 28th July the decree nisi made no order as ......
-
Tumath v Tumath
...(for example, mutual decrees instead of a decree to the Petitioner alone, or a discretionary decree instead of a decree as of right)". In Field v. Field (1964 P. 336), Mr Justice Wrangham (rightly in my view) refused to recognise the existence of any rule of public policy as Enunciated for ......
-
Ramelize v Ramelize
...Davis, J.A. further stared that this principle was recognised by Salmon, L.J. in Tumath v. Tumath [1970] 1 All E.R. 111 at p. 113 ‘f’ and Field v. Field [1964] 2 All E.R. 81 hence Davis, J.A. also referred to the procedure in England whereby in an uncontested petition where the respondent a......
-
Poon Lok To Otto Formerly Known As Pun Lok To Otto v Kan Lai Kwan Also Known As Kan Lai Kwan Kay And Another
...[1957] P 19. [118] At pp 28-29. Hodson and Morris LJJ agreed. [119] [1960] P 118; followed by a number of cases including Field v Field [1964] P 336. [120] At p [121] Ibid. [122] [1969] 1 WLR 1155. [123]...
Request a trial to view additional results