Figgins v Ward and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1834 |
| Date | 01 January 1834 |
| Court | Exchequer |
English Reports Citation: 149 E.R. 826
EXCH. OF PLEAS.
S. C. 4 Tyr. 282; 2 Dowl. P. C. 364; 3 L. J. Ex. 135.
826 PIGGINS V. WARD 2 C. tc M. 425. figgins v. ward and others. Exch. of Pleas. 1834.-Where, in -mi action on a joint promissory note against several defendants, they suffer judgment by default, service of the rule on one is service on all. [S. C. 4 Tyr. 282; 2 Dowl. P. C. 364; 3 L. J. Ex. 135.] This was an action on a joint'promissory note against three defendants. The defendants having suffered judgment by default, and a rule nisi to compute the principal and interest due on the note having been obtained- Halcomb now moved to make that rule absolute, on an affidavit of service on one of the defendants, who was an attorney, by leaving a copy with him, and two other copies for the other defendants. bayley, B. By suffering judgment to go by default, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
- The Royal Bank of Trinidad and Tobago v Wears et Al
-
Amlot v Evans and Others
...of the affidavit. Streeten contended that the objection was not a valid one, and that it had been so decided in Figgins v. Jfanl (2 C. & M. 424). There, in an action on a promissory note against three defendants, who suffered judgment by default,, it was held that service of tho rule on oae......