Filmlab Systems International Ltd and Another v Pennington and Others
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 02 July 1993 |
Date | 02 July 1993 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Phillips v Symes (No. 3)
... ... the present application, Mr Symes swore another affidavit, his twenty-fifth, on 22nd August 2003 ... ...
-
Phillips v Symes (No. 3)
... ... proceedings against the appellant and others on 27 February 2001 on the ground that there had ... moving them from one location to another." ... 11 The ... ...
-
Phillips v Symes (Expert Witnesses: Costs)
...possibly a contempt of court (page 581). 68 In my judgment, the sensible way forward was that provided by Aldous J in Filmlab Systems International Limited -v- Pennington [1995] 1 WLR 673, namely that the consideration should take place afterwards "although on rare occasions it might be de......
-
B v B (Wasted Costs Order)
...hearing was inappropriate as well as likely to be disproportionate in terms of costs; Filmlab Systems International Ltd v Pennington [1994] 4 All ER 673 (2) It could not be right for a respondent to seek to prevent an otherwise wholly meritorious application for wasted costs proceedings mer......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
The Wasted Costs Jurisdiction
...in Warren vWarren [1997]QB 488, 495.13 The Times August 8 1998.14 The Times December 4 1995.15 [1998] 1 FCR 605.16 [1996] 1 WLR 491.17 [1995] 1 WLR 673. The case was decided before Ridehalgh was reported.18 The Times December 4 1995. The figure of £400,000 does not appear in this report, bu......
-
SELECTED CASE LAW DEVELOPMENTS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE
...For other recent decisions on the scope of the duty, see R v Horsham DC ex p Wenman[1994] 4 All ER 681; Filmlab Systems v Pennington[1994] 4 All ER 673. 34 (1965) 115 CLR 140. 35 Ibid, at p 147. 36 [1994] 1 MLJ 434. 37 [1921] 2 KB 664. 38 Both Justices delivered a single judgment which was ......