Finkielkraut v Monohan
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1949 |
| Year | 1949 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Vacciana v Oxford Prudential Holdings
...giver even in the absence of the incorporation of such a clause through the Standard Conditions of Sale. In Finkielkrant v. Manahan [1949] 2 ALL E.R. 234 the headnote reads: “On December 10, 1947, a contract was concluded for the sale of certain property. On March 31, 1948, the vendor sent ......
-
Geddes Meyer v Kehvin Dickinson
...for completion and that, in any event, damages are an adequate remedy. To further buttress her argument, she referred the Court to Finkielkraut v Monohan 11 to establish that a person seeking specific performance must show that he or she was able to complete the agreement on the date fixed ......
-
Mccave v Simon
...to choose either to rescind, recovering or returning the deposit on the ground that time has been made of the essence by notice (see Finkielkraut v Monohan [1949] 2 All E.R. 234) or else simply to treat the notice as ineffective (see Horton v Kurzke [1971] 1 WLR 769; also Re Prestbury Inves......
-
Ramlal v Mahase et Al
...choose either to rescind, recovering, or returning the deposit, on the ground that time has been made of the essence by notice (see Finkielkraut v Monohan [1949] 2 All E.R. 234) or else simply to treat the notice as ineffective ( Horton v Kurzke [1971] 1 WLR 769; also Re Prestbury Investmen......
Request a trial to view additional results