Fish v General Medical Council

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date2012
Neutral Citation[2012] EWHC 1269 (Admin)
Date2012
Year2012
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
43 cases
  • Motala v General Medical Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 26 Octubre 2017
    ...19 An appeal under s.40 of the Medical Act 1983 is by way of re-hearing, but as Foskett J observed in Fish v General Medical Council [2012] EWHC 1269 (Admin) at paragraph 28: “It is a re-hearing without hearing again the 20 This court will allow an appeal where the decision of the tribunal ......
  • Ijaz Hayat v General Medical Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 28 Julio 2017
    ...However, "it is a re-hearing without hearing again the evidence", as Foskett J. explained in Fish v General Medical Council [2012] EWHC 1269 (Admin), at [28]. 9 The approach to be taken by an appellate court to professional regulatory appeals was considered by the Court of Appeal and Privy ......
  • The Law Society of Ireland v Coleman
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 7 Septiembre 2020
    ...that finding of a sustainable basis in law. The judgments of the High Court of England and Wales in Fish v. General Medical Council [2012] EWHC 1269 (Admin), and Williams v. Solicitors Regulatory Authority [2017] EWHC 1478 (Admin), are cited in support of these propositions. Counsel also re......
  • Dr Olakunle Arowojolu v General Medical Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 11 Diciembre 2019
    ...an appeal under s 40 is by way of re-hearing. However, such an appeal ‘is a re-hearing without hearing again the evidence’: see Fish v General Medical Council [2012] EWHC (Admin) 1269, [28]. Applying CPR r 52.21, the Court must allow the appeal if the decision of the Tribunal was wrong or ......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT