Fisher against Bristow and Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date15 June 1779
Date15 June 1779
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 99 E.R. 140

IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH

Fisher against Bristow and Others

fisher against bristow and others. Tuesday, 15th June, 1779. An action for a malicious prosecution cannot be maintained till the prosecution is terminated, which must appear upon the declaration. Action for a malicious presentment, (for incest,) in the Ecclesiastical Court of the Archdeaconry of Huntingdon. Demurrer to the declaration, and cause assigned, that it was not stated, how the prosecution was disposed of, or that it was not still depending. The Court were clearly of opinion, that the objection was fatal, and said it was settled that the plaintiff in such an action, must shew the original suit, wherever instituted, to be at an end ; otherwise he might recover in the action, and yet be afterwards convicted on the original prosecution. Judgment for the defendants a rope-maker, and made cordage for divers and very many persons, other...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Nagle v Shea
    • Ireland
    • Court of Exchequer Chamber (Ireland)
    • 29 April 1875
    ...B., J., and DOWSE, B. NAGLE and SHEA. Lessee of Parsons v. PurcellUNK 12 Ir. L. R. 90. Call v. DunningENR 4 East, 53. Abbott v. PlumbENR 1 Doug. 215. The King v. The Inhabitants of Harringworth 4 M. & Sel. 350, 353. Darby v. OuseleyENR 1 H. & N. 1, 5. Brown v. BrownENR 8 E. & B. 876. Gordon......
  • The Wardens and Commonalty of the Mistery of Fishmongers of the City of London v Robertson and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Common Pleas
    • 1 February 1847
    ...the subscribing witness to prove the execution of the agreement; Gall v. Dunning (5 Esp. N. P. C. 16, 4 East, 53), Abbot v. Plumbe (1 Dougl. 215); the admission not being made for the purpose of the cause, and the agreement not being set up by the defendants ~as parties claiming an interest......
  • Le Grange against Hamilton
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • 1 January 1793
    ...against hamilton. 1793. The judgment in this case (vide ante, 4 vol. 613) was affirmed in the Exchequer Chamber, in the last term. (a)1 Dougl. 215, 3d edit. (b) Ante, 2 vol. 41. (a)2 Vide Bamford v. Baron, ante, 2 vol. 594, n. (a). English Reports Citation: 101 E.R. 205 IN THE COURT OF KIN......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT