Fisken v Fisken

JurisdictionScotland
Judgment Date20 October 1900
Date20 October 1900
Docket NumberNo. 3.
CourtCourt of Session
Court of Session
2d Division

Ld. Kyllachy, Lord Trayner, Lord Moncreiff, Lord Justice-Clerk, Lord young.

No. 3.
Fisken
and
Fisken.

ProcessReclaiming NoteCompetencyAuthentication of RecordFailure to print Interlocutor cloning RecordJudicature Act, 1825 (6 Geo. IV. c. 120), secs. 10 and 18A. S., 11th July 1828, sec. 77Court of Session Act, 1850 (13 and 14 Vict. c. 36), sec. 5.

Held that a reclaiming note was not rendered incompetent by the omission to print the interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary closing the record.

In this action, at the instance of William Fisken, Glasgow, against his wife, the Lord Ordinary (Kyllachy) pronounced an interlocutor closing the record, and sending the case to the Procedure-roll on 20th June 1900.

Thereafter, by interlocutor, dated 4th July 1900, the Lord Ordinary allowed the record to be opened up, certain amendments to be made, and of new closed the record, and sent the case to proof.

After proof the Lord Ordinary assoilzied the defender on 28th August 1900.

The pursuer reclaimed, and boxed along with his reclaiming note a copy of the record as finally amended, and closed on 4th July, having printed thereon all the interlocutors in the case, with the exception of that of July 4th. On the reclaiming note appearing in the Single Bills counsel for the defender objected to it as incompetent, on account of this omission.*

Argued for the defender;The provisions of the Act of Parliament and of the Act of Sederunt were imperative. The proper authentication of a record, according to modern practice, was the interlocutor closing it. Such interlocutor was invariably in practice printed and boxed with the reclaiming note. Here the first interlocutor closing the record was printed, but the record had been thereafter opened up and amendments put on, and the interlocutor finally closing the record was not printed, and accordingly there were before the Court amendments which, so far as the prints shewed, were un-authenticated. The reclaiming note accordingly fell to be refused as incompetent.1

Argued for the pursuer;The reclaiming note was competent. The provisions of the statutes were merely directory. In any case, there was no direction that all the interlocutors should be printed, but only that the record, in the state in which it had been authenticated, should be printed, which had been done here. There was no case of a reclaiming note having been refused on account of the interlocutor closing the record not having been printed. In Willia...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Criminal Practice Directions 2015
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 29 September 2015
    ...the defendant to relax and for counsel to summarise the evidence for him and to take further instructions. Photographs of court facilities 3F.7 Resident Judges in the Crown Court or the Chief Clerk or other responsible person in the magistrates' courts should, in consultation with HMCTS man......
  • Stormonth Darling v Young
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 30 October 1914
    ...by the landlord, for the benefit of the neighbourhood’—Small Landholders (Scotland) Act, 1911 (1 and 2 Geo. V. cap. 49), secs. 26 (3) (f), (7), (10), and 32—Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act, 1908 (8 Edw. VII. cap. 64), sec. 35 (I)—Crofters Holdings (Scotland) Act, 1886 (49 and 50 Vict. ......
  • Spady v Spady Estate,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 31 August 2022
    ...1 13521 77071 642 180 90412 16.00 QB 2022 202262 Clean Clean false false 6 pt 6 pt 0 3 false false false false EN-CA X-NONE X-NONE {62960F95-3F7C-4170-9F9E-726A80D66A28} ...
  • South African Association of Personal Injury Lawyers v Heath and Others
    • South Africa
    • 4 April 2000
    ...to receive the receipt when it is issued, it must be affixed to a prominent place on the premises. ...... (6) Subject to subsections (2), (3) (f), (7), (8), (9) and (10), any member of 2000 JDR 0402 p62 Coetzee AJ Special Investigating Unit or a police officer at the request of such a membe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
23 firm's commentaries
  • Camp’s Market Discount Proposal Is A Mixed Bag For Distressed Debt
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 24 March 2015
    ...at the time of the issuance of the instrument, to create a real debtor-creditor relationship?") (emphasis added); Treas. Reg. § 1.1001-3(f)(7)(ii) (in determining whether a modification of a debt instrument results in an instrument that is not debt for tax purposes, "any deterioration in th......
  • Environmental Plaintiff Dealt a Blow in Storm Water Case
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 21 March 2007
    ...at the point it enters a watercourse, it could not meet its burden under the CWA and establish a point source. The court also took on the issue of whether the hillside watercourses were properly considered “navigable waters.” In one of the first decisions within the Ninth Circuit to apply the Sup......
  • Debt Exchanges (Debt Restructuring)
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 18 July 2012
    ...even if the modification is treated as significant under the other provisions of Treasury regulation section 1.1001-3. Treas. Reg. § 1.1001-3(f)(7)(ii)(A). For a discussion of these regulations, see Richard M. Lipton, Proposed Regulations Address Impact of a Decline in Debt Issuer's Financi......
  • Proposed Wellness Plan Legislation Responds To Lawsuits Filed By EEOC
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 20 March 2015
    ...See https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/620. See also http://www.help.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/?id=7d5490e3-3f7a-46d5-b812-e8acc94e4d5b&groups=Chair. 3.42 U.S.C. §§ 12112(d)(4)(B) & 4.42 U.S.C. § 12201(c)(2). 5.42 U.S.C. § 2000ff-1(b)(2). http://www.eeo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
19 books & journal articles
  • Index
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Texas Employment Law. Volume 1 Part VIII. Selected litigation issues
    • 5 May 2018
    ...agreements in, §14:5 Company policies regarding, §16:14.B Employment contracts, arbitration provisions, §§2:3.B.2, 2:3.C.1, 2:3.D.2.,2:3.F.7 Frequently litigated issue Generally, §14:3 Applicability of FAA/TGAA, §14:2:C Consent, §14:4.A Consideration, §14:3.B At-will employment, §14:3.B.1 G......
  • Index
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 2 - 2014 Part VIII. Selected litigation issues
    • 16 August 2014
    ...agreements in, §14:5 Company policies regarding, §16:14.B Employment contracts, arbitration provisions, §§2:3.B.2, 2:3.C.1, 2:3.D.2.,2:3.F.7 Frequently litigated issue Generally, §14:3 Applicability of FAA/TGAA, §14:2:C Consent, §14:4.A Consideration, §14:3.B At-will employment, §14:3.B.1 R......
  • Index
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 2 - 2016 Part VIII. Selected Litigation Issues
    • 27 July 2016
    ...agreements in, §14:5 Company policies regarding, §16:14.B Employment contracts, arbitration provisions, §§2:3.B.2, 2:3.C.1, 2:3.D.2.,2:3.F.7 Frequently litigated issue Generally, §14:3 Applicability of FAA/TGAA, §14:2:C Consent, §14:4.A Consideration, §14:3.B At-will employment, §14:3.B.1 R......
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 2 - 2016 Part VIII. Selected Litigation Issues
    • 27 July 2016
    ...Witter Reynolds, Inc. , 905 F.2d 104 (5th Cir. 1990), on remand , 939 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1991), dism’d , 975 F.2d 1161 (5th Cir. 1992), §§2:3.F.7, 16:14.B.1, 23:7 Alice Leasing Corp. v. Castillo , 53 S.W.3d 433, 441 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2001, pet. denied), §1:6.C.3 Ali v. Douglas Cable Co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 forms
  • Form W-9 (sp), Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification
    • United States
    • United States Forms Treasury Department
    • 1 January 2024
    ...del Reglamento, el pago se considera hecho a ese beneficiario y no se requiere la retención. Vea las secciones 1.1441-1(b)(9) y 1.1471-3(f)(7) del Para más información sobre beneficiarios extranjeros, vea las Instructions for the Requester of Forms W-8BEN, W-8BEN-E, W-8ECI, W-8EXP, and W-8I......
15 provisions

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT