Un fist feoffment de uno Campo per fait a un & a ses Heirs, en mesme le fait
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 336
DEL COMMON-BANK
Un fist feoffment de uno Campo per fait a un & a ses Heirs, en mesme le fait
LXVIII. Un fist feoffment de urio Campo per fait a un & a ses Heirs, en mesme le fait Warrant &c. & les parols fuerunt, & ego le feoffor Warrant, dictum croft, al feoffee & ses Heirs, & fuit agree que c fuit voyd garranty; car ne fuit ascun Croft devant mencyoti & le Camp nest my garrant, car ne sont ascun parols en le fait a Iyer le feoffor al c encore fuit le intent d'aver un garrant de mesme le Camp : car auter chose ne fuit estre garrant ne mencyon en le fait pur que cest part del fait pluistost serra prise come voyd que a conster c...
To continue reading
Request your trial
48 cases
-
Ormiston Arnold Boyea Hudson Willliams Claimants v Eastern Caribbean Flour Mills Ltd Defendant [ECSC]
...May 30th 2000 (para. 8 at pg. 97) (t) Mr. Jai Bennie on April 13th 2000 (para. 4.6 (2) at pg. 39 to 40) (u) Mr. Felix Mathurin on June 23rd and 29th(schedule 11 (d) at pg. 2 of 7) (4) The following documents amount to hearsay evidence and are inadmissible and are excised from the Report: No......
-
Dean Jonas Petitioner v Jacqui Quinn-Leandro Marilyn Simon Lorna Simon The Electoral Commission Respondents [ECSC]
...election. 8.7 The matters set out … amounted to the corrupt practices of bribery, …. and undue influence for the purposes of sections 29, …( and) 29B … of the Act." 57 He drew the Court's attention to the relevant statutory provisions and authorities. Section 29 of the Act (as relevant) pro......
-
Akai Holdings Ltd (in Compulsory Liquidation) v Brinlow Investments Ltd and Others
...of Mr. Borrelli's evidence in respect of IEL is to be found in his 28th, 29th and 30th affidavits. The essence of Mr. Borrelli's 11th, 28th and 29th affidavits has already been encapsulated in a written judgment of this Court delivered on 21 July 2006. In a nutshell, they state that Mr. Tam......
- DPP v McKillen
Request a trial to view additional results