Fitzgerald v Firbank

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1897
Year1897
Date1897
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
18 cases
  • Nicholls v Ely Beet Sugar Factory
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... The same rule applies to an action for polluting a several fishery and damaging the fish ... Fitzgerald v. Firbank [1897] 2 Ch. 96 explained and applied ... Whether the rule applies to every kind of nuisance action, quaere ... WITNESS ACTION ... The ... ...
  • Mason v Clarke
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • March 24, 1955
    ...circumstances, he was clearly entitled to bring an action for trespass against the Respondent. See Holford v. Pritchard 3 Ex. 793, Fitzgerald v. Firbank [1897] 2 Ch. 34I agree with the motion proposed. Lord Reid My Lords, 35This case arises out of a simple transaction of no great importan......
  • King v David Allen and Sons Billposting Ltd
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • June 25, 1915
    ...nom. Edwardes v. Barrington. Edwardes v. BarringtonUNK 85 L. T. 650. Edwardes v. BarringtonUNK 85 L. T. R. 652. Fitzgerald v. FirbankELR [1897] 2 Ch. 96. Formby v. BarkerELR [1903] 2 Ch. 539. Frost v. KnightELR L. R. 7 Ex. 111, at p. 112. Heap v. HartleyELR 42 Ch. D. 461. Hill v. TupperENR ......
  • Stretford v Mole and Lee
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • April 3, 1941
    ...Revenue, 19 T.C. 490. Weiner v. Harris, [1910] 1 K.B. 285. Duke of Sutherland v. Heathcote, [1892] 1 Ch. 475. Fitzgerald v. Firbank, [1897] 2 Ch. 96.Coalville Urban District Council v. Boyce, 18 T.C. 655. 15. The Commissioners found that the payments made by the Appellants under the provisi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • A critique of the legal framework for wildlife protection in Malawi
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Malawi Law Journal No. 3-2, January 2009
    • January 1, 2009
    ...Laws of England 4th ed (2003 reissue) para 514, citing Ewart v Graham (1859) 7 HLCas 331, 334 345 as authority.36 Fitzgerald v Firbank [1897] 2 Ch 96, CA; 2(1) Halsbury’s Laws of England 4th ed (2003 reissue)para 515.37 Cf Heydon’s Case (1584) 76 ER 637. In Black Cl awson International Ltd ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT