Flower v Lloyd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1876 |
| Date | 1876 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
56 cases
- Chee Seng & Company Sdn Bhd; Seng Huat Hang Sdn Bhd and Others
-
Martin Raymond Owens v Mark Noble
...must be pleaded and properly proved by the aggrieved party in a fresh action. There is, he submitted, a long line of cases, going back to Flower v Lloyd (1877) 6 Ch. D. 297 and Jonesco v Beard [1930] AC 298 to support that proposition. He accepted that more recent authority such as Kuwait A......
-
Sudhana Singh v Governing Body of Moorlands Primary School and Another
...be maintained was not explored in argument before us. It appears to have originated in a procedure in Chancery called a "bill of review": Flower v Lloyd (1877) 6 ChD 297. But nowadays it seems to be treated simply as an action based on fraud: see e.g. Jaffray v The Society of Lloyds [2007] ......
-
Jaffray v Society of Lloyd's
...by one of the parties; and there is authority directly denying the existence of jurisdiction in the latter case both in this court ( Flower v Lloyd (1877) 6 ChD 297) and in the House of Lords ( Jonesco v Beard [1930] AC 298), it being held in both of those cases that the proper remedy is to......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
JUDGMENT OBTAINED BY FRAUD
...obtained by fraud can be set aside on an action being brought afterwards. However, as Baggallay, L.J., said in Flower v. Lloyd (1878-9) 10 Ch. D 327 at 334 before such an action can succeed, it shall be clearly proved that a judgment has been obtained by the fraud of one of the parties whic......