Forcelux Ltd v Sweetman and another
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 2001 |
| Date | 2001 |
| Court | Lands Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
Decision Nº LRX 86 2012. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 21-10-2013
...Management Limited, for the Respondent © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013 The following cases are referred to in this decision: Forcelux v Sweetman [2001] 2 EGLR 173 Johnson v County Bideford Ltd [2013] L&TR 18 London Borough of Brent v Shulem B Association Ltd [2011] EWHC 1663 (Ch) Weston v Ian France......
-
Decision Nº LRX 16 2012. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 14-03-2013
...decision: McHale v Cadogan Estate [2010] EWCA Civ 14 Daejan Investments Limited v Benson [2009] UKUT 233 Forcelux Limited v Sweetman [2001] 2 EGLR 173 Earl Cadogan v 27-28 Sloane Gardens Ltd [2006] L & TR 18 DECISION Introduction This is an appeal from a decision of the Leasehold Valuation ......
-
LVT/0008/06/20 and LVT/0025/09/20: Joyce Close, Newport
...exercise… “NCH was under no obligation to obtain the cheapest price possible. The Land’s Tribunal, in Forcelux Limited v. Sweetman [2001} 2 EGLR 173 confirmed that “the question I have to answer is not whether the expenditure for any particular service charge item was necessarily the cheape......
-
The London Borough of Hounslow v Waaler
...member considered the process of decision-making, I do not consider that that can be taken to limit the scope of the inquiry. 32 Forcelux Ltd v Sweetman [2001] 2 EGLR 173 concerned the recovery of insurance premiums. The member said: "[39] In determining the issues regarding the insuranc......
Request a trial to view additional results