Foskett (an Infant) v Mistry
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1984 |
| Year | 1984 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
-
Shawn Harrigan v Melvin Pickering
...6 No. 1, Journal of the Law Association of Trinidad & Tobago; Butterworth's Personal Injury Litigation Service; and the case FOSKETT (An Infant) v MISTRY RTR 1984 Page 1. CONCLUSIONS 49 This case turns upon the facts. The Claimant gives one version. The Defendant gives another. The independ......
- Morales (an Infant) v Eccleston
-
Charlotte Rainford (A Protected Party, by her Father and Litigation Friend Ian Rainford) v Kay Lawrenson
...framework 4 Given the fact sensitive nature of the case it is not necessary to embark upon an extensive review of legal authorities. In Foskett v Mistry [1984] 1 RTR 1 May LJ said, "The root of this liability is negligence, and what is negligence depends on the facts with which you are to d......
-
Ramharack v Caroni 1975 Ltd et Al
...would emerge from the gap. The first Defendant therefore had to keep a proper look out and drive sit a safe speed. 24 Foskett v Mistry (1984) R.T.R. 1 and Tremayne v Hill (1987) R.T.R. 131 were also cited in argument, but they neither expand upon nor detract from the principles emerging fro......
Request a trial to view additional results