Foster v Foster
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1714 |
| Date | 01 January 1714 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 983
King's Bench Division
9. foster versus foster. Entr Triri. 1659. Rot. 751. Use ne aerra raise per fait quant les parties intend ceo al auter purpose. Cro. 1. 127. Cro. 3. 394. Marg. Foster covenant bargaine & vend pur divers bone considerations cybien que pur consideration de 201. al son eigne fits que il aver tiel terre quel fait ne fuit paa inroll & puis il infeoffe son puisne fits & mor', et si lestate pas al eigne fits ou nemy fuit aoven foits argue, et per Curiam leigne fits nad ascun estate, car le conveyance ne poit operat al common ley, quia fault ceremony. Et per Statute de Inrollmenta pur money paid &c. ne poit quia le fait ne fuit inroll, et per voy de use ne poit car le intent des parties appiert deins le face del fait que ne operate per voy de use, et donque est cornon rule q use ne unque surger encounter lintent des parties intant que ceo est le grand director del uses. 1 Inst. 271. Et Pitfield & Pierces case, Hill. 11 Car. en cest Court fuit cite quel fuit in effect, I give and grant to my son, and to the heira of his body, to have and to hold after my death, & adjudge que nul use surger, vide March. R. . . . 21 H. 7. 18. Et fuit dit que lintent des parties in ceat case fuit que cest fait serra soleraenfc come articles de covenant & agreement in order al further assurance, et pur ceo le object' que use surger potius q fait serra de nul effect fault. Et fuit affirme p Twisden...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gibbons against Pepper
...that any judgment, or even opinion, was given in the case. (d) Hob. 206. 1 Ld. Ray. 40. (e) Noy, 87. Poph. 187. Latch, 167. Jones, 173. 1 Sid. 82. Wentworth's Off, of Ex. 94. (/) Wentworth's Off. of Ex. 98. Moor, 400. Cro. Eliz. 377. Latch, 168. 1 Lev. 193. (g) 1 Roll. Abr. 912. Cro. Car. 2......
-
Colton against Senhouse
...401. (b) 2 Roll. Abr. 788. See also Hob. 313. (c) March, page 50, case 78, and S. C. 2 Roll. Abr. 789. (d) Hilary term, 13 & 14 Car. 2. 1 Sid. 82. 1 Lev. 55. 1 Keb. 160, 225, 274, 319. Ray. 43. Finch Ch. Rep. 170, and cited in Scudamore v. Crossing, 1 Mod. 177. 2 SHOW. K. B. 14. TRINITY TER......
-
George Foster v Grace Foster. Ejectment
...George Foster and Grace Foster. Ejectment [43] george foster versus grace foster. ejectment. Durham, Trin. 1659, Eot. 751. Uses. 1 Lev. 55. 1 Sid. 82. 1 Keb. 160, 225, 274, 319. The plaintiff declares, that Nicholas Foster, 12 Jan. 1658, at the parish of Haughton in the Spring, demised to h......
-
Foster against Foster
...294 COURT OF KING'S BENCHFoster against Foster foster against foster. Agreement to convey to the son, will not raise a use. S. C. Raym. 43. 1 Sid. 82. 1 Keb. 160, 225, 274. Ejectment, and upon a special verdict, the case was, Margery Foster being seized, there was a deed made between her an......