Foster v Friedland
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1992 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Savings & Investment Bank Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Fincken (No 2)
...known as the "unambiguous impropriety" exception, a phrase coined by Hoffmann LJ in ( Forster v. Friedland CA, 10 November 1992, transcript No 1052 of 1992, unreported) and adopted in later cases such as Unilever plc v. The Procter & Gamble Co [2000] 1 WLR 2436 at 2444G. On that basis the......
-
Unilever Plc v Procter and Gamble Company
...of the evidence would act as a cloak for perjury, blackmail or other "unambiguous impropriety" (the expression used by Hoffmann LJ in Foster v Friedland, 10 November 1992, CAT 1052). Examples (helpfully collected in Foskett's Law & Practice of Compromise, 4th ed, para 9–32) are two first-in......
- Instance and Others v Denny Bros Printing Ltd and Others (Interim Injunction)