Foster v Great Western Railway Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1882 |
| Date | 1882 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Knight v Clifton
...be supported unless the Plaintiff was entitled to bring the action". The other members of the Court concurred. 11 Next is Foster v. Great Western Railway Company (1882 8 Queen's Bench Division, 515) also in this Court. That was a case in which it was held that the Railway Commissioners had ......
-
Ottway v Jones
...matter. But decisions to which our attention has been drawn by Mr Vowden for theAppellant (of which the last one cited, Foster v. The Great Western Railway, in this Court, reported in 8 Queen's Bunch Division, at page 515, is an example) do I think undoubtedly establish as a general proposi......
-
Re Madden's Estate
... ... S.) 83. Dublin, Wicklow, and Wexford Railway CompanyUNK 31 L. R. Ir. 1. Foster v. Great ... case of the Dublin, Wicklow, and Wexford Railway Company (3), also gave costs against the Crown, and it may be that ... [1902 ... Appeal. there, following Foster v. Great Western Railway Company (1), the 1901. Court decided that the ... ...
-
E.n.e. Kos v Petroleo Brasileiro S.a. (petrobas)
...costs where they had not previously had jurisdiction to do so: see Ex parte Mercers' Company, (1879) 10 Ch D 481 per Jessel MR. In Foster v Great Western Ry Co, (1882) 8 QBD 515 and In re Mills' Estate, (1886) LR 34 Ch D 24 that view was rejected. In the latter case Cotton LJ asked (at p.3......
Request a trial to view additional results