Foster v Mackinnon
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Year | 1865 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
43 cases
- M Pakiam v YP Devathanjam
- Karuppanan and Another; Nallammal and Another
-
National Bank of Chicago v How Lee Realty Pte Ltd and Others
...on the circumstances of the case and the nature of the document which it is thought is being signed.` Byles J in Foster v Mackinnon (1869) LR 4 CP 704 said: at least if there be no negligence, the signature so obtained is of no force. And it is invalid, not merely on the ground of fraud, if......
-
The Governors and Company of The Bank of Ireland v Patrick M'Manamy and Others
......Clay ( 1 ), and Foster v. M'Kinnon ( 2 ); secondly, because Ahern must be taken to have acted as agent for the plaintiffs, citing Chaplin v. Brammall ( 3 ). I admitted ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Contract formation
...Mohd Ali v Dawood Sultan Kamaldin [2015] SGCA 36 at [119].Compare Lloyds Bank PLC v Waterhouse [1993] 2 FLR 97. 557 Foster v Mackinnon (1869) LR 4 CP 704. 558 As to which see Chapter 6. 559 See Westminster City Council v Reema Construction Ltd (No 2) (1990) 24 Con LR 26 at 44, per Judge Bow......
-
The application of the defence of non est factum: an exploration of its limits and boundaries.
...of Salmon LJ in Gallie v Lee [1969] 2 Ch 17, 42. (57) Thoroughgood v Cole (1584) 2 Co Rep 9a; 76 ER 408. (58) Foster v MacKinnon (1869) LR 4 CP 704; [1861-73] All ER Rep 1913. See also, Lewis v Clay (1897) 67 LJQB (59) [1985] 2 All ER 281. (60) [1993] 2 FLR 97. (61) Bank of Australasia v Re......
-
CONCEPT OF NON EST FACTUM
...it be radically transformed? As to the early history, the authorities referred to in the judgment of Byles J. in Foster v. Mackinnon (1869) L.R. 4 CP 704, 711 12, (and also referred to in Holdsworths History of English Law Vol. 8 pp. 50751) were cited in the argument in this appeal. Having......