Fotherlyes Case
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1657 |
Date | 01 January 1657 |
Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 124 E.R. 116
COMMON BANCK AND EXCHEQUER
[21] FOTHERtYES CASK. Prohibition, Ordinary, Distribution, Biens de Intestate. Nicholas Fotherly fuit seisie del Copihold terre al value da 401. per annum, & surrender ceo al use del feme pur vie, & apres devye possesse del bieus al value de 200 1. Et Anne son feme prist Adrainistracon. Mary Fotherlie soer del Intestate eeant le heire, sur que le Copybould descend en reversion, sue in Court del Ordinary pur faire distribution des biens, & le Ordinary assigne 20 1. a luy. Et Anne pria pro-hibicon. Finch Recorder, devaut le statute de 21 E. 3, cap. 11. Le Ordinary puist faire distribution sans question, & le statute ne deprive luy de son poiar. Et in temps del Snor Hubbard, quant un Prohibicou fuit desire in cest case apres several Arguments le Court advise le Administrator al submitter al clistribucon, & pur ceo que le matter icy est petit, jeo conceive que vous ne voile grauuter un Prohibicon, & auxi le Guatome de cest Court est, nemy a graunter Prohibicon aprea decree on sentence done, &c. UTTI.1TON, 22. HILL. 2 CAR. IN COMMUNI BANCO 117 Richardson. Ceat neat novel case, car 12 Jac. Tuckers Case fuit longement debate, & Prohibicon graunt la, & un greinder, ou meindur surame, &c. tie voet changer le ley. Car si la Ordinary poet fairer distribucon in petit sums, auxi poet in greiuder ; & est a voier que Prohibicon doet ee prie in due tempa, mes ceo eat in cases queux concerne interest & droits quel depend longement, & adouque sont setled, la le Court voet grauntsr Prohibicon, mes icy vous venier al Ordinary que pria distribucon, & est grautit maintenaiint, & pur ceo Prohibicon iie poet ee prie citius. Et jeo avoy demand del Ordinary de quel reason il distribute, & il solement...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Throckmerton v Tracy, &
...impendendo, and the grantee has divers faculties, yet the (c) H. 4 Ed. 3, 4 b. Fitz. Brief, 703. P. 5 Ed. 3. 17. a. Dy. 126. pi. 49. Co. Litt. 21. a. 2 Eol. Abr. 67. pi. 17. Poph. 126. 182. 2 Bae. Abr. 494. ante 158. (d). (d) Litt. 298. Dy. 10. pi. 36. 126. pi. 49. Dal. 30. pi. 10. 67. pi. ......
-
The Case Hill. Term
...Abr. 676. pi. 14. Vin. Abr. tit. Evidence C. b. pi. 5, for this is no gift in frank-marriage. Bro. Frank-Marriage 11. B. N. C. g 347. Co. Litt. 21. b. (c) 2 Eol. Abr. 676. pi. 14. Vin. Abr. tit. Evidence C. b. pi. 6. Heath's Max. 9. 80. (d) T. 4 H. 7. 14. b. per Keble. Bro. Baily 27. Lit. E......
-
Thomas Wimbish and Elizabeth his wife, plaintiffs, and Elizabeth Tailbois, Defendant
...Vampage. 35 Ass. pi. 14. Fitz. Tail 17. Bro. Estates, 36. Tail 20. 35 Ass. pi. 15. Bro. Estates 61. Tail 21. 1 Rol. Abr. 838. T. pi. 4. Co. Litt. 21. a. 7 Co. 40 b. Perk. 169. 2 Rol. Rep. 217. 5 Mod. 268. Salk. 621. 1 P. Wms. 15. Kitch. 306. Vin. Abr. tit. Estate T. and T. 5. pi. 2. (d) M. ......
-
Caroline Colmore, Spinster, and Frind Cregoe, Esq. - Plaintiffs; Thomas Tyndall, and James Rawlins-Defendants
...taken an estate in fee, yet it is cut down by the subsequent clause to an estate tail. In Thurman v. Cooper (Poph. 138. Cro. Jac. 476. Co. Lit. 21 b.), lands were given to a man and woman (who afterwards inter married), and to their heirs and assigns : habendum to them and the heirs of thei......
-
North British Railway Act 1907
...(' llethil Doclis I' dial1 lie held to include and refer to the new clock aiid the doclis as defiiie(1 by this Act. F:ic.ilities for tr'Lfic lit 21. The Company shall so lay out and equip the nen- tlock with all proper sidings hoists works and conreniences as to ~nalic adequate and suitable......