Fox v Fox
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1865 |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Equity |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Haworth v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
...the rule in Phipps v. Ackers (1842) 9 Cl. & F. 583 or (b) as a gift carrying the intermediate income, under the rule in Fox v. Fox (1875) L.R. 19 Eq. 286. For the Crown it was contended that there was a single contingent gift to a class comprising the children and grandchildren as distinct ......
-
Haworth v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
...the rule in Phipps v. Ackers (1842) 9 Cl. & F. 583 or (b) as a gift carrying the intermediate income, under the rule in Fox v. Fox (1875) L.R. 19 Eq. 286. For the Crown it was contended that there was a single contingent gift to a class comprising the children and grandchildren as distinct ......
- M'Kay v M'Kay
-
Allan Estate, Re, (1980) 31 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 510 (PEISC)
...until the time of payment arrives, the gift is vested and the rule applies though the interest may be given for maintenance. Fox v. Fox, L.R. 19, Eq. 286, was one of those cases and Sir Jessel, M.R., there quotes the language of Lord Cottenham in Watson v. Hayes, 41 E.R. 319. "It is we......