Fox v Star Newspaper Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1898
Date1898

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
47 cases
  • Majlis Peguam Malaysia and Others v Raja Segaran S Krishnan
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Fox v "The Star" Newspaper, Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 15 December 1899
    ... ... Queen in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioner might have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, might seem meet; as also upon the printed case of "The Star Newspaper Company, Limited, lodged in answer to the said Appeal: Counsel were accordingly called in; and no Counsel appearing for the said Appellant, he was heard for himself at the Bar; and Counsel appearing for the said Respondents, but not being called on; And due consideration being had this day of what was ... ...
  • Ooi Swee King v Standard Chartered Saadiq Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2024
  • Lim Lek Yan v Yayasan Melaka
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2013
  • Get Started for Free
4 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 25-29, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 3 November 2021
    ...792, De Shazo v. Nations Energy Co., 2006 ABCA 400, DLC Holdings Corp. v. Payne, 2021 BCCA 31, Fox v. Star Newspaper Company, [1898] 1 Q.B. 636, Schlund v. Foster (1908), 11 O.W.R. 175, Blum v. Blum, [1965] 1 O.R. 236, Hennig v. Northern Heights (Sault) Ltd. (1980), 30 O.R. (2d) 346, Sampso......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 25-29, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 3 November 2021
    ...792, De Shazo v. Nations Energy Co., 2006 ABCA 400, DLC Holdings Corp. v. Payne, 2021 BCCA 31, Fox v. Star Newspaper Company, [1898] 1 Q.B. 636, Schlund v. Foster (1908), 11 O.W.R. 175, Blum v. Blum, [1965] 1 O.R. 236, Hennig v. Northern Heights (Sault) Ltd. (1980), 30 O.R. (2d) 346, Sampso......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Upholds Setting Aside Of A Notice Of Discontinuance
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 3 November 2021
    ...once it reached a certain point was a principle that existed for over 100 years. In the English case of Fox v. Star Newspaper Co. [1898] 1 Q.B. 636 (C.A.), aff'd [1900] A.C. 19 (H.L.), Lord Chitty found as The principle of the rule is plain. It is that after the proceedings have reached a c......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Upholds Setting Aside Of A Notice Of Discontinuance
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 3 November 2021
    ...once it reached a certain point was a principle that existed for over 100 years. In the English case of Fox v. Star Newspaper Co. [1898] 1 Q.B. 636 (C.A.), aff'd [1900] A.C. 19 (H.L.), Lord Chitty found as The principle of the rule is plain. It is that after the proceedings have reached a c......