Frank Pais, The (Guisa)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1986
Year1986
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Admiralty)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Inter Maritime Management Sdn Bhd v Kai Tai Timber Company Ltd, Hong Kong
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • The "Jian He"
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 18 September 1999
    ... ... construe the jurisdiction clause in accordance with the rules of construction here: see The Frank Pais [1986] 1 Lloyd`s Rep 529 at p 530. On the first ground, the learned judge held that `the ... ...
  • The "Hyundai Fortune"
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 9 September 2004
    ...(folld) El Amria, The [1981] 2 Lloyd's Rep 119 (folld) Eleftheria, The [1970] P 94; [1969] 1 Lloyd's Rep 237 (folld) Frank Pais, The [1986] 1 Lloyd's Rep 529 (folld) Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd v UCO Bank [2004] 1 SLR (R) 6; [2004] 1 SLR 6 (folld) Hung Vuong-2, The [2000] 2 SLR (R) ......
  • Star Shipping A.S. v China National Foreign Trade Transportation Corporation (Star Texas)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 May 1993
    ...W.L.R. 207 per Megaw L.J.at page 215 and The "Iran Vojdan" [1984] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 380 per Bingham J. at page 385). There are cases such as the Frank Pais [1986] 529 where the objectional part of a choice of jurisdiction clause can be severed leaving the rest of the clause unaffected. But in ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • THE CONTRACTUAL BASIS OF THE ENFORCEMENT OF EXCLUSIVE AND NON-EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...of the main text below. 29 See Part VI of the main text below. 30 See Part VI Section C(2) of the main text below. 31 The Frank Pais [1986] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 529 at 530; The Jian He[2000] 1 SLR 8 at [16]. 32 Vita Food Products Inc v Unus Shipping Co Ltd [1939] AC 277 (PC Nova Scotia); Peh Teck ......
  • NO DISPUTE AMOUNTING TO STRONG CAUSE; STRONG CAUSE FOR DISPUTE?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2001, December 2001
    • 1 December 2001
    ...para 11. 11 Ibid, para 21. 12 The Vishva Prabha [1979] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 286, The Atlantic Song[1983] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 394, The Frank Pais[1986] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 529. Though not referred to in the judgment, this approach recently resurfaced in England in Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Sh......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT