FREDERICK LEYLAND & Company, Ltd (J. RUSSELL & Company ) v COMPANIA PANAMENA EUROPEA NAVEGACION, LIMITADA
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1943 |
Date | 1943 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Hong Huat Development Company (Pte) Ltd v Hiap Hong & Company Pte Ltd
...The [1993] 2 Lloyd's Rep 408 (refd) Frederick Leyland & Co Ltd (J Russell & Co) v Compania Panamena Europea Navigacion Limitada (1943) 76 Ll L Rep 113 (folld) Lubenham Fidelities and Investments Co Ltd v South Pembrokeshire District Council (1986) 33 BLR 39 (refd) Macarthur v Campbell (1833......
-
Portsmouth City Council v Ensign Highways Ltd
...James Homes (Grosvenor Dock) Ltd [2006] BLR 113. 107 In that case Jackson J considered authorities such as Frederick Leyland and Co Ltd v Compania Panamena Europea Navigacion Limitada [1943] 76 Ll L Rep 113; Perini Corporation v Commonwealth of Australia [1969] 12 BLR 82; and London Borough......
-
Karl Construction Limited V. Palisade Properties Plc
...on the matter, however, are relatively sparse; I was referred to two cases, Panamena Europea Navigacion v Frederick Leyland & Co, (1943) 76 Lloyds Rep 113; [1947] AC 428 and Lubenham Fidelities and Investments Company Limited v South Pembrokeshire District Council, supra. [24]In my opinion,......
-
B R Cantrell and E P Cantrell v Wright & Fuller Ltd
...submitted that they could not be breaches of contract by [the Employer]. He referred to Panamena Europea Navigacion v Leyland (1943) 76 Lloyd's Rep 113 (CA) and [1947] AC 428 (HL) as applied by Macfarlan J in Perini Corporation v Commonwealth of Australia [1969] 2 NSWR 350. In the former ca......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
EMPLOYERS’ RESPONSIBILITY FOR ARCHITECTS’ CERTIFICATIONS: THE IMPLIED TERM THAT NEVER WAS HONG HUAT AND BEYOND
...quantified by the contractor in terms of interest at commercial rates. 26 Frederick Leyland & Co Ltd v Panamena Europea Navigation (1943) 76 Lloyd’s Rep 113. 27 Perini Corp v Commonwealth of Australia (1969) 12 BLR 82. 28 As did Woo JC in para 80 of the High Court Judgment. 29 See para 18 o......