Gamsford v Griffith
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1714 |
| Date | 01 January 1714 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 1136
King's Bench Division
[328] 9. gamsford versus griffith. Lou parols in indenture come de covenants &c. serront pris come distinct sentences, & lou come un entire sentence. Dett sur obligacon defendant demand oyer, & fuit pur performe covenants & plead performance, plaintiff reply que inter auters est covenant that the indenture of lease at the time of the assignment is a good, true, and indefeasible lease, and that (le plaintiff) shall enjoy, &c. without the let or interruption of the defendant, or any claiming from, by, or under him-et monstre pur breach que devant cesty que fist le lease riens ad un J. S. fuit seisie in fee. Et q cesty que fist le lease enter sur luy, & luy disseise, & lease prout, & que J. S. re-enter &c. sur quel replication defendant demurr. 1 SID. 329. PASCH. 19 CAR. II. B. B. 1137 Et le sole doubt fuit lequel-indefeasible lease-&c. serra construe come distinct sentence ou ove reference al darr' parols-without the interruption of the defendant -et le Court sur several arguments semble que les darr' parols ne mitigate ou qualifie les primer mes q sont distinct clauses uncore ils allow lo regie que restraining parols al commencement ou al fine del sentence governer' tout-sed icy sont issint distinct que les darr' parols-that he shall enjoy it without the let or interruption-tie poeut sans impropriety de parlance ee' apply al prim clause de-indefeasible lease. Et ils compare ceo al case de covenant que fuit aeisie notwithstanding any act done by the feoffor, and that the lands are of such value, &c. icy le darr' parte quant al value est absolute & nient qualifie per le primer. Et si le agreement des parties & 1'intent fuit que avera &...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gainsford v Griffith
...usage of conveyances is to make one covenant independent of the other; and the judgment of the C. B. was reversed. 2 Rol. Abr. 250, pi. 4. 1 Sid. 328.(i!) (2) Cro. Eliz. 674, S. C. by which it appears that the Court gave judgment upon another point. The authority of this case upon the point......
-
Todd and his Wife against Redford
...for the money laid out in cure of the wife as well as for the battery, and intire damages being given, it is bad for the whole; and cited 1 Sid. 328. Yelv. 106. 2 Vent. 29. 2 Cro. 625. 1 Lev. 3, but the husband should have sued alone for the money laid out in the cure. Raymond for the plain......
-
Browing v S. Wright and Others, Executors of J. Wright
...for seisin in fee and power to sell Bub that case was afterwards reversed, as appears from a manuscript copy of that book, s well as from 1 Sid. 328, though Saunders, who was Counsel for the Plaintiff in Sainsforth v. Griffith, 1 Sautid. 60, by attempting to distinguish that ease on the gro......
-
Hayward against Kinsey
...second action, yet because they were averred to be for the same cause, and that confessed by the demurrer, the plaintiff had judgment. Vide 1 Sid. 328. That this is a course which haa now obtained in the Common Pleas. Fide 2 Vent. 193, 259. But note: there is no judgment in either case. Sec......