Gardner and Another v Marsh and Parsons (A Firm) and Another
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 13 November 1996 |
Date | 13 November 1996 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Murfin v Campbell
...Mr Sephton submits that this approach is contrary to that which I am required to adopt by applying the Court of Appeal decision in Gardner v. Marsh & Parsons [1997] 1 WLR 489. I reject that submission. First, if and to the extent that there is a conflict between that decision and the decisi......
-
Centenary 6 Limited Against Tlt Llp
...Ltd v Lowick Rose LLP [2018] AC 313, Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd [1994] 1 AC 85, Gardner v Marsh & Parsons [1997] 1 WLR 489, p503). There was no authority for the argument being advanced here of a hypothetical (unlike an actual) collateral action by a third party......
-
Catlin Estates Ltd v Carter Jonas (A Firm)
...of an award of damages is to be linked directly to the loss sustained …" 268 This general approach was also taken by Hirst LJ in Gardner v Marsh & Parsons [1997] 1 WLR 489 at 498. Hirst LJ referred to Westinghouse & Hussey v Eels and went on at 503: "In evaluating these arguments I bear ver......
-
Pankhania v Hackney London Borough Council
...own benefit, and not as part of a continuous transaction of which the purchase of land and bungalow was the inception". 30. In Gardner v. Marsh & Parsons [199731 W.L.R. 489, the Court of Appeal again rejected a defendant's attempt to argue that the normal measure should be displaced because......
Request a trial to view additional results