Genne against Tinker
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1797 |
Date | 01 January 1797 |
Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 83 E.R. 558
IN THE COMMON PLEAS.
5.58 MICHAELMAS, 33 CHARLES II. 3LEV.24. [24] michaelmas teem, in the thirty-third year of the reign of charles II. in the common pleas. genne against tinker. An award ill pleaded by the defendant; the plaintiff need not assign a breach. 1 Salk. 138. 1 Saunders, 102. 3 Bac. Ab. 716. Debt upon an obligation, whereby the defendant and two others were to perform an award made betwixt them and the plaintiff. The defendant pleaded the award; which was, that the defendant should pay the t plaintiff 20s. and each of the others 20s. a-piece, and that he tendered the 20s. so to be paid by him, which the plaintiff refused to accept of. The plaintiff replied, that at a day after the refusal he demanded the said 20s. of the defendant, which the defendant then refused to pay him. The defendant demurred ; and per Cur'; the replication is idle : for the 20s. being a sum collateral to the obligation was lost for ever by the first refusal, 9 Co. 79 a. Co. Lit. 207 a. Lit...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Veale v Warner
...done, inasmuch as he is answerable for the whole money; the plea is insufficient, and the plaintiff has no necessity to assign a breach. 3 Lev. 24, Gvnne v. Tinker. (c) A receipt is not conclusive evidence against the party giving it; but he may shew that it was given under a misapprehensio......
-
Hayman v Gerrard
...void. Ibid, et vide post, 327, note (!).() * Cro. Eliz. 320. t Ibid. 899, and Yelv. 24, S. C. I Yelv. 78. Judgment of the Court. (2) So is 3 Lev. 24, Genne v. Tinker. 1 Salk. 138, Meredith and Alleyn. (a) But see post, 327, note (3) contra. 1 Was. SAUND. 103. MICH. 19 CAR. II. REGIS 111 Cou......
-
Hutton against Beech
...the suit," and that the plaintiff stetit inch quietus. 2 Roll. Ab. 432. S. C. 1 Roll. Rep. 7, 8. S. C. 2 Bulst. 93. 1 Leon. 71. Moor, 3. 3 Lev. 24. 1 Vent. 87. 4 Bac. Abr. 94. A plea " that the party prosecuted by a bill in Chancery," must shew that a subpoena issued on the bill. Intend mer......
-
Adcock v Wood
...of principal and surety Aftei verdict, every reasonable intendment will be made in support of the award They also cited Genne v Tinker (3 Lev 24) Then, as to the second objection The arbitiatoi, to whom the money is awarded to be paid, is not in the situation of a stranger, but is a trustee......