Gerry Maher and Barry J Rodger, CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE SCOTTISH COURTS Edinburgh: W Green (www.wgreen.co.uk), 2010. liv +418 pp. ISBN 9780414013681. £140.

Published date01 January 2012
AuthorKirsty J Hood
Pages134-135
Date01 January 2012
DOI10.3366/elr.2012.0093

One would expect a comprehensive, practical, work on jurisdiction to be ever-present on the litigator's library shelf. After all, it is a truism that, whether ultimately it proves to be a tricky issue in a case, or whether uncontroversial, jurisdiction must always be considered by the litigator prior to raising an action. However, even to leaf through the pages of Duncan and Dykes on The Principles of Civil Jurisdiction as applied in the Law of Scotland (1911) is to appreciate not just the scale of legal change, but even of political and social shifts, in the century which has now elapsed since its publication. It was not simply that the European Union (an important source of jurisdictional rules in recent times) did not then exist, but neither did the political landscape from which it sprang. Many layers of legislation, and countless cases, have accumulated since 1911. Accordingly, the publication of Professor Maher and Professor Rodger's new, single volume, work, Civil Jurisdiction in the Scottish Courts is timely, and very much to be welcomed. The work is aimed firmly at the practitioner, and forms part of the “Greens Practice Library” series.

The authors have adopted a logical framework which allows proper discussion of their subject, yet have managed to combine this with an emphasis on the practical application of its rules. The structure of the work is such that a practitioner new to the topic, reading the volume as a whole, will gain a clear impression of the rationale for, and the operation of, the jurisdictional rules – whilst those dipping into the work for guidance on a particular puzzle, can easily identify to which section of the work they must turn. The volume opens with chapters on, respectively, basic concepts, and the sources and structure of the law of jurisdiction. In the latter chapter, it is made plain that centre-stage in the work will necessarily be the jurisdictional rules which we might associate with the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982, i.e., the Brussels I Regulation (replacing the Brussels Convention which was reproduced in Schedule 1 of the 1982 Act), the new Lugano Convention (which is similar, but not identical, to the Brussels I Regulation), the Schedule 4 rules on allocating jurisdiction between component parts of the UK, and the rules as to jurisdiction in Scotland which are contained in Schedule 8. The desire to approach the topic from the viewpoint of the practitioner leads the authors to use Schedule 8...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT