Gibbins v Skinner
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1951 |
Year | 1951 |
Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
- Brantley and Others v Constituency Boundaries Commission and Others (Saint Christopher and Nevis)
-
Attorney-General Appellant v William Valentine Herbert Respondent [ECSC]
...of regularity was applicable. In reference to the latter alternative, he cited three cases In support.— 12 Boyd-Gibbins v Skinner (1951) 1 All E.R. 1049 ; 13 Scott v Baker (1968) 2 All E.R. 993 at p.1001; 14 Akar v Attorney-General of Sierra Leone (1969) 3 All E.R. 384 at p.391. 15 C......
-
Attorney General v Herbert
...of regularity was applicable. In reference to the latter alternative, he cited three cases in support:– Boyd-Gibbins v Skinner (1951) 1 All E.R. 1049 ; Scott v Baker (1968) 2 All E.R. 993 at p. 1001; Akar v Attorney-General of Sierra Leone (1969)3 All E.R. 384 at p. 391. 10 Counsel f......
-
The Attorney General v Peter Alfred Davies
...but faintly argued that it was not and I think the argument is untenable. Although the ratio decidendi of Boyd-Gibbins v. Skinner 1951 1 All E.R. 1049 was that the erection of a sign indicating a speed limit was prima facie evidence that all necessary steps had been taken to prescribe that ......