Gibbon v Pease

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1905
Year1905
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
  • Chantrey Martin v Martin
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 14 July 1953
    ...that the remainder of the documents listed above should not be produced, but we were told by Counsel that his decision was based on Gibbon v. Pease, 1905, 1 King's Bench, page 810, where it washeld that the plans prepared by an architect employed by a building owner to carry out alterations......
  • Khoo Boo Gong v Manson-Hing
    • Malaysia
    • Supreme Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Balfour Beatty Regional v Construction Ltd (formerly Mansell Construction Services Ltd)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 29 July 2022
    ...on the subject of record keeping”, (iv) on the basis of an entitlement to internal documents produced for BB's benefit (relying on Gibbon v Pease [1905] 1 KB 810); and (v) because they were entitled to pre-action disclosure. In the same letter dated 22 March, CMS set out again the document......
  • Formica Ltd v Export Credits Guarantee Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 13 July 1994
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Case Law Updates - August 2022
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 5 September 2022
    ...subject of record keeping", On the basis of an entitlement to internal documents produced for BB's benefit (relying on Gibbon v Pease [1905] 1 KB 810); Because they were entitled to pre-action disclosure BM responded that the relevant information would be disclosed if found. At this point t......
1 books & journal articles
  • Intellectual property
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...Bhd v Patco Malaysia Sdn Bhd (1984) 28 BLR 129 at 137. 105 Ebdy v M’Gowan (1870) Hudson’s BC (4th edition, volume 2) 9; Gibbon v Pease [1905] 1 KB 810. However, it will be usual, subject to any agreement of the parties, for copyright to remain with the designer even though the ownership of ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT