Gibbs v Guild
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1882 |
| Year | 1882 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
34 cases
- Abdul Shukor bin Mohamed Noh and Others; Sivaperumal Pillai
-
M.(K.) v. M.(H.), [1992] 3 SCR 6
...Schafer, 427 N.W.2d 606 (1988); Nicolette v. Carey, 751 F.Supp. 695 (1990); Levitt v. Carr (1992), 66 B.C.L.R. (2d) 58; Gibbs v. Guild (1882), 9 Q.B.D. 59; Armstrong v. Milburn (1886), 54 L.T. 723; Oelkers v. Ellis, [1914] 2 K.B. 139; Lynn v. Bamber, [1930] 2 K.B. 72; Legh v. Legh (1930), 1......
-
K.M. v. H.M., (1992) 57 O.A.C. 321 (SCC)
...[para. 45]. Levitt v. Carr et al. (1992), 12 B.C.A.C. 27; 23 W.A.C. 27; 66 B.C.L.R.(2d) 58 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 46]. Gibbs v. Guild (1882), 9 Q.B.D. 59 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Armstrong v. Milburn (1886), 54 L.T. 723 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 58]. Oelkers v. Ellis, [1914] 2 K.B. 139, refd ......
- Instantcolor System Sdn Bhd v Inkmaker Asia Pacific Sdn Bhd
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
The application of statutory time limitation provisions by analogy to claims in equity's exclusive jurisdiction
...Statute of Limitations by analogy if there were clear fraud involved, or if to do so would lead to an inequitable result: Gibbs v Guild (1882) 9 QBD 59 ... Indeed, if equity always followed the law in all respects it is not easy to see how it could ever have become a distinct jurisprudence.......