Gilbert & Partners v Knight
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1968 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
- Syarikat Binaan Utara Jaya v Koperasi Serbaguna Sungai Glugor Bhd
-
IAN McGLINN v WALTHAM CONTRACTORS Ltd and Others
...see, for example, Keating on Construction Contracts, 8 th Edition, paragraph 13–067 and the case referred to in the text there, Gilbert & Partners v Knight [1968] 2 All ER 248. Accordingly, there can be no basis in principle which would permit Mr McGlinn retrospectively and unilaterally to......
- Ch’ng Ghee Weng and Another v Lee Khoon Eng T/A Prestige Construction
-
Rowe v Vale of White Horse District Council
...client when he accepted them was reasonably entitled to assume that the architect was undertaking them for no additional charge: (see Gilbert v. Knight [1968] 2 All ER 248). In this case it does not matter that Mr Rowe has no defence of change of position. Under English law (unlike Continen......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Contract administration
...a contractor is concerned, is whether the contract administrator owes the contractor a duty of care. 546 Gilbert & Partners v Knight [1968] 2 All ER 248 (CA). 547 Paciic Associates Inc v Baxter [1990] 1 QB 993 at 1010–1011, per Purchas LJ. See also Shapiro, “Design Professionals’ Liability ......
-
QUANTUM MERUIT
...before he can rightly claim for the new or extra work done by the default of the other party. see Gilbert & Partners v. Knight (1968) 2 All E.R 248." - Per Aderemi, J.C.A., in D.P.M.S. Ltd. v. Larmie Suit No. CA/L/441/97; (2000) 5 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 655) 138 at (4) "The learned author of Hal......