Gilchrist (as trustee of the J P Gilchrist 1993 Settlement) v Revenue and Customs Comrs

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date11 April 2014
Neutral Citation[2014] UKUT 169 (TCC)
Date11 April 2014
CourtUpper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
14 cases
  • Lee Victor Addlesee (and the others listed in the Schedule annexed to the Amended Claim Form) v Dentons Europe LLP
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • October 2, 2019
    ...privilege. 87 Mr Grant rightly points out that Garvin was followed by Judge Berner in Ford v Financial Conduct Authority [2018] UKUT 358 (TCC) and by Arnold J in Shlosberg. It is also referred to in a number of leading textbooks, usually as supporting the proposition that legal advice privi......
  • Strategic Branding Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
    • December 1, 2021
    ...(or “satisfied”) that the earlier decision is wrong (see Gilchrist (as trustee of the JP Gilchrist 1993 Settlement) v R & C Commrs [2014] BTC 513 at [85] to [101] and Fiander v R & C Commrs [2021] BTC 534 at [36]). I do not consider that HMRC's intention to appeal, or even the fact of a pen......
  • MH (Review; Slip Rule; Church Witnesses) Iran
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • March 11, 2020
    ... ... CG [2004] UKIAT 303 Gilchrist v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and ... ...
  • C v Governing Body of a School
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • Invalid date
    ... ... :2017:0905JUD007811713; 66 EHRR 26, GC Gilchrist v Revenue and Customs Comrs [2014] UKUT 169 ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Weekly Tax Update - May 11th
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • May 15, 2015
    ...before the first ten year anniversary under IHTA 1984 s.69(5)(c). This case followed the Upper Tribunal (UT) decision in Gilchrist ([2014] UKUT 0169 (TCC)) that it was not bound by the 2009 High Court decision in Pierce v Wood (EWHC The Mrs M Seddon Second Discretionary Settlement was estab......
2 books & journal articles
  • STANDING AS A BARRIER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO CIVIL AG-GAG STATUTES.
    • United States
    • Case Western Reserve Law Review Vol. 69 No. 1, September 2018
    • September 22, 2018
    ...in part by W. Watersheds Project v. Michael, No. 15-CV-169-SWS, 2018 WL 5318261, at *10 (D. Wyo. Oct. 29, 2018); Act of Mar. 12, 2015, ch. 183, [section] 3, 2015 Wyo. Sess. Laws (codified as amended at Wyo. Stat Ann. [section] 40-27-101 (2017)), held unconstitutional in part by W. Watershed......
  • Revisiting the Precedential Status of Crown Court Decisions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 85-1, February 2021
    • February 1, 2021
    ...(Admin); [2010] 2 WLR 1012, [75], and on appeal [2011] UKSC 28; [2012] 1 AC 663, [43]; Gilchrist v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2014] UKUT 169 (TCC); [2015] Ch 183, 26. Senior Courts Act 1981 s 45(1).27. RE Megarry, ‘Reporting the Unreported’ (1954) 70 LQR 246, 250.28. [2007] EWHC 349......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT