Gillespie Bros. & Company Ltd v Roy Bowles Transport Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1971 |
| Year | 1971 |
| Date | 1971 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
7 cases
-
British Crane Hire Corporation Ltd v Ipswich Plant Hire Ltd
... ... The hiring charges and transport charges were agreed. Nothing was said about conditions ... was not of equal bargaining power with the garage company which repaired the care The conditions were not ... from responsibility for his own negligence: see Gillespie's case, (1973) 1 Q. B., at page 415. There are no such ... ...
- Hair and Skin Trading Company Ltd v Norman Airfreight Carriers Ltd
-
Shell U.K. Ltd v Lostock Garage Ltd
...Clauses (1975) Command 605, in paragraphs 178 to 183, which are well worth reading in this context: and my few words in Gillespie Bros, v. Roy Bowles Ltd. (1973) 1 Queen's Bench at pages 415/416. 32 Applying this test, what do we find here? Shell stipulated in 1966 that the garage-owner sho......
-
Levison v Patent Steam Carpet Cleaning Company Ltd
...into law. You never know what may happen to a bill. Meanwhile the common law has its own principles ready to hand. In Gillespie Bros. & Co. v. Bowles (Roy) Transport (1973) 1 Queen's Bench 400. I suggested that an exemption or limitation clause should not be given effect if it was unrea......
Get Started for Free