Gillingham Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock Company Ltd and Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date31 July 1991
Date31 July 1991
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
32 cases
6 books & journal articles
  • The Symbiosis of Property and English Environmental Law – Property Rights in a Public Law Context
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 76-6, November 2013
    • 1 November 2013
    ...Barr vBiffa Waste Services Ltd [2012]EWCA Civ 312; [2012] WLR 795 at [78]–[80].112 As held by Buckley J in Gillingham vMedway Dock [1993] QB 343, 359, planning permission fordevelopments that are significant enough to change the character of a neighbourhood will betaken into account in weigh......
  • Far Beyond ‘The Early Morning Crowing of a Farmyard Cock’: Revisiting the Place of Nuisance within Legal and Political Discourse
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Social & Legal Studies No. 11-1, March 2002
    • 1 March 2002
    ...Co. Ltd v Cape Town Tramways Co. Ltd [1902] A.C. 381 Gaunt v Finney [1872] 8 Ch App 8Gillingham BC v Medway (Chatham) Dock Co. Ltd [1992] 3 All ER 923Goldman v Hargreave [1966] 2 All ER 989Halsey v Esso [1961] 2 All ER 145Hannam v Mockett [1824] 2 B. & C. 934Holbeck Hall Hotel v Scarborough......
  • Sources of Authority: Common Law
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Land-use Planning
    • 23 June 2017
    ...manufacturer. 127 Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co , 272 US 365 at 388 (1926). 128 Desrosiers , above note 4 at para 5. 129 (1992), [1993] QB 343 [ Gillingham ]. LAND USE PLANNING 154 of a major shipping container operation, and not as the neighbourhood had been previously. 130 In Gilli......
  • Nuisance — the Environmental Tort? Hunter v Canary Wharf in the House of Lords
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 61-6, November 1998
    • 1 November 1998
    ...that compliance with a planningpermission should act as a defence to an action in nuisance: see Gillingham BC vMedway (Chatham)Dock [1993] QB 343, Wheeler vJJ Saunders Ltd [1995] 3 WLR 466, and Hunter in the Court ofAppeal.13 [1893] 1 Ch 216.14 [1936] 2 KB 468.15 [1895] AC 587.The Modern La......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT