Glaxo Plc v Glaxo-Wellcome Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1995 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
- Kailash Center for Personal Development Inc. v Yoga Magik Pty Ltd
-
British Telecommunications Plc v One in A Million Ltd
...which the law of passing-off depends. He then considered Direct Line Group Ltd v Direct Line Estate Agency (1997) FSR 374 and Glaxo Plc v Glaxowellcome Ltd (1996) FSR 388. Those were cases where interlocutory relief was granted which prevented use of company names that had been registered......
-
Aveda Corporation v Dabur India Ltd
...conclude that this was an undertaking which combined the two previously separate undertakings (see Glaxo Group Ltd v Glaxowellcome Ltd [1996] FSR 388). The essence of the Court of Justice's reasoning in Medion v Thomson is that an average consumer of leisure electronic products confronted ......
-
Kabushiki Kaisha Yakult Honsha And Others v Yakudo Group Holdings Ltd And Another
...& Co. AG v Suhner Ltd [1967] RPC 336; Fletcher Challenge Ltd v Fletcher Challenger Pty Ltd [1982] FSR 1; Glaxo Plc v Glaxo-Wellcome Ltd [1996] FSR 388; Direct Line Group Ltd v Direct Line Estate Agency Ltd [1997] FSR 374. In British Telecommunications Plc v One in a Million Ltd [1999] FSR 1......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Cyberbusters versus Cybersquatters: Round II in the ZADNA Ring
...registered a company‘Glaxowellcome Ltd’ in anticipation of the merger of Glaxo and Wellcome. The Court in Glaxo plc vGlaxowellcome Ltd [1996] FSR 388 ordered the defendant to change the company’s name to enable theplaintiff to register the merged company under that name. Another example of ......