Glegg v Bromley
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Year | 1912 |
| Date | 1912 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
169 cases
- RG Sabhapathi Pillay v Tham Hing Kwai
- Osman bin Abdul Ghani and Others v United Asian Bank Bhd
-
Re Sarflax Ltd
...be struck out as disclosing no reasonable cause of action (post, pp. 602A-F, 612C-E). Middleton v. Pollock (1876) 2 Ch.D. 104;Glegg v. Bromley[1912] 3 K.B. 474, C.A.; In re Lloyd's Furniture Palace Ltd.[1925] Ch. 853 and Tomkins v. Saffery (1877) 3 App.Cas. 213, H.L.(E.) applied. The follow......
- Marcan v Lloyds Bank Ltd (pet dis)
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Litigation Funding Comparative Guide
...do not purchase legal claims, but take an equitable assignment of a share of the fruits of the action under the rule in Glegg v Bromley [1912] 3 KB 474, such that the claimant remains the owner and ultimate controller of the 6.2 How does a funder purchase a claim out of an insolvency? Claim......
17 books & journal articles
-
Introduction
...from public third party funding, which I discuss below. McIntyre Estate v Ontario (AG), [2002] OJ No 3417 [McIntyre]; Glegg v Bromley, [1912] 3 KB 474 (CA); Campbell’s Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty, [2006] HCA 41 [Fostif]. Legal Services Act (UK), 2007, c 29; Fostif, ibid; Arkin v Borch......
-
Strategy for de Fendants Facing a Leave Motion to Commence a Class Act Ion Under the Securities Act
...from public third party funding, which I discuss below. McIntyre Estate v Ontario (AG), [2002] OJ No 3417 [McIntyre]; Glegg v Bromley, [1912] 3 KB 474 (CA); Campbell’s Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty, [2006] HCA 41 [Fostif]. Legal Services Act (UK), 2007, c 29; Fostif, ibid; Arkin v Borch......
-
Reconciling Limitation Period Principles with the Purposes and Complexity of Ontario Class Proceedings
...from public third party funding, which I discuss below. McIntyre Estate v Ontario (AG), [2002] OJ No 3417 [McIntyre]; Glegg v Bromley, [1912] 3 KB 474 (CA); Campbell’s Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty, [2006] HCA 41 [Fostif]. Legal Services Act (UK), 2007, c 29; Fostif, ibid; Arkin v Borch......
-
A Real and Substantial Look at Jurisdiction in the Civil and Class Action Settings
...from public third party funding, which I discuss below. McIntyre Estate v Ontario (AG), [2002] OJ No 3417 [McIntyre]; Glegg v Bromley, [1912] 3 KB 474 (CA); Campbell’s Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty, [2006] HCA 41 [Fostif]. Legal Services Act (UK), 2007, c 29; Fostif, ibid; Arkin v Borch......
Get Started for Free
