Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Glegg v Bromley

The Law Reports Cited in 238 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1912
Year1912
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
198 cases
1 firm's commentaries
  • Litigation Funding Comparative Guide
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 1 March 2023
    ...do not purchase legal claims, but take an equitable assignment of a share of the fruits of the action under the rule in Glegg v Bromley [1912] 3 KB 474, such that the claimant remains the owner and ultimate controller of the 6.2 How does a funder purchase a claim out of an insolvency? Claim......
20 books & journal articles
  • The Trendtex Principle in Australian Law: Context and Recent Developments
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 40-2, September 2016
    • 1 September 2016
    ...Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 386, 484 (Callinan and Heydon JJ). 6Alabaster v Harness [1895] 1 QB 339, 342 (Lord Esher MR); Glegg v Bromley [1912] 3 KB 474, 489-490 (Parker J); Stevens v Keogh (1946) 72 CLR 1, 28 (Dixon J); Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Limited v Fostif Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 386, ......
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 8-2, May 2013
    • 1 May 2013
    ...from public third party funding, which I discuss below. McIntyre Estate v Ontario (AG), [2002] OJ No 3417 [McIntyre]; Glegg v Bromley, [1912] 3 KB 474 (CA); Campbell’s Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty, [2006] HCA 41 [Fostif]. Legal Services Act (UK), 2007, c 29; Fostif, ibid; Arkin v Borch......
  • Strategy for de Fendants Facing a Leave Motion to Commence a Class Act Ion Under the Securities Act
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 8-2, May 2013
    • 1 May 2013
    ...from public third party funding, which I discuss below. McIntyre Estate v Ontario (AG), [2002] OJ No 3417 [McIntyre]; Glegg v Bromley, [1912] 3 KB 474 (CA); Campbell’s Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty, [2006] HCA 41 [Fostif]. Legal Services Act (UK), 2007, c 29; Fostif, ibid; Arkin v Borch......
  • Reconciling Limitation Period Principles with the Purposes and Complexity of Ontario Class Proceedings
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 8-2, May 2013
    • 1 May 2013
    ...from public third party funding, which I discuss below. McIntyre Estate v Ontario (AG), [2002] OJ No 3417 [McIntyre]; Glegg v Bromley, [1912] 3 KB 474 (CA); Campbell’s Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty, [2006] HCA 41 [Fostif]. Legal Services Act (UK), 2007, c 29; Fostif, ibid; Arkin v Borch......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT